From Digital Age to Nano Age. WorldWide.

Tag: Rubriks

Robotic Automations

How Rubrik’s IPO paid off big for Greylock VC Asheem Chandna | TechCrunch


When Asheem Chandna drove up to Rubrik’s office in Palo Alto on a Friday night in early 2015, he was looking forward to learning what the young company that had yet to build its product would show him. The Greylock partner wasn’t disappointed.

The company’s CEO, Bipul Sinha, drew Rubrik’s plan to revamp the data management and recovery market on a whiteboard. “The old versus new architecture he presented was very compelling,” Chandna said. “Based on my knowledge of the sector, I knew it could be built into a large business.”

That was a prescient call. On Thursday, nine years after that meeting, Rubric began its life as a publicly traded company with a market cap of over $6 billion. Greylock holds a 13% stake, according to the latest SEC filings. By the close of market Friday, with shares priced at $38, those nearly 19.9 million shares were worth over $756 million. 

But Chandna says it was much more than Rubrik’s desire to take on the arcane data recovery market that motivated him to lead Rubrik’s $40 million Series B in May 2015. (The Series B round sold for $2.45/share, adjusting for splits, according to those SEC documents. While Greylock also participated in later rounds at higher prices, Chandra’s returns on this one are hefty.) 

“The longer I do what I do, the more I fundamentally believe that venture is a people business,” said Chandna, who has been an investor for over 20 years and has an enviable track record of successful exits. He has helped incubate Palo Alto Networks in Greylock’s offices and was on the nearly $100 billion-worth company’s board until last year. Chandna was also an early investor in AppDynamics, Sumo Logic and Arista Networks.

Chandna looks for people who are not only motivated and ambitious, but are also self-aware of their weaknesses, and can recruit people who can get things done in areas that are not the founder’s strong suits.  

Another essential ingredient for a founder is grit. “If you had technology that was adequate, but slightly inferior to my technology, but you were very self-aware and persistent, you will beat me,” he said.

That’s what he saw in Sinha. Rubrik’s founder had a lifelong dream of starting a company. When he founded the data management and recovery startup in 2013, he couldn’t find strong engineers who wanted to come work there, Chandra recalled. The business he was trying to build was inherently not sexy at the time. 

Despite having been an investor with Lightspeed for four years before launching Rubrik, recruiting talent turned out to be a big challenge for Sinha. But he didn’t give up. He pinged engineers on LinkedIn and then invited them for coffee blocks away from where they worked.

“Startup journeys are very hard, even for the most successful companies,” Chandna said. “I want people who won’t take ‘no’ for an answer.”

Perhaps it was Sinha’s grit and ambition that compelled him to take his company public despite the lukewarm IPO environment.

“Rubric has just under $800 million in annualized recurring revenue,” Chandna said, “That’s larger than most companies that went public in the last many years. I think they just wanted to get on with it.”

Chandna declined to say if he expects other Greylock portfolio companies to follow Rubrik’s lead but added emphatically that the firm’s best-performing late-stage businesses are Abnormal Security, Cato Networks, Discord, Figma and Lyra Health.

We will be following their fate closely.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Rubrik’s IPO filing reveals an AI governance committee. Get used to it. | TechCrunch


Tucked into Rubrik’s IPO filing this week — between the parts about employee count and cost statements — was a nugget that reveals how the data management company is thinking about generative AI and the risks that accompany the new tech: Rubrik has quietly set up a governance committee to oversee how artificial intelligence is implemented in its business.

According to the Form S-1, the new AI governance committee includes managers from Rubrik’s engineering, product, legal and information security teams. Together, the teams will evaluate the potential legal, security and business risks of using generative AI tools and ponder “steps that can be taken to mitigate any such risks,” the filing reads.

To be clear, Rubrik is not an AI business at its core — its sole AI product, a chatbot called Ruby that it launched in November 2023, is built on Microsoft and OpenAI APIs. But like many others, Rubrik (and its current and future investors) is considering a future in which AI will play a growing role in its business. Here’s why we should expect more moves like this going forward.

Growing regulatory scrutiny

Some companies are adopting AI best practices to take the initiative, but others will be pushed to do so by regulations such as the EU AI Act.

Dubbed “the world’s first comprehensive AI law,” the landmark legislation — expected to become law across the bloc later this year — bans some AI use cases that are deemed to bring “unacceptable risk,” and defines other “high risk” applications. The bill also lays out governance rules aimed at reducing risks that might scale harms like bias and discrimination. This risk-rating approach is likely to be broadly adopted by companies looking for a reasoned way forward for adopting AI.

Privacy and data protection lawyer Eduardo Ustaran, a partner at Hogan Lovells International LLP, expects the EU AI Act and its myriad obligations to amplify the need for AI governance, which will in turn require committees. “Aside from its strategic role to devise and oversee an AI governance program, from an operational perspective, AI governance committees are a key tool in addressing and minimizing risks,” he said. “This is because collectively, a properly established and resourced committee should be able to anticipate all areas of risk and work with the business to deal with them before they materialize. In a sense, an AI governance committee will serve as a basis for all other governance efforts and provide much-needed reassurance to avoid compliance gaps.”

In a recent policy paper on the EU AI Act’s implications for corporate governance, ESG and compliance consultant Katharina Miller concurred, recommending that companies establish AI governance committees as a compliance measure.

Legal scrutiny

Compliance isn’t only meant to please regulators. The EU AI Act has teeth, and “the penalties for non-compliance with the AI Act are significant,” British-American law firm Norton Rose Fulbright noted.

Its scope also goes beyond Europe. “Companies operating outside the EU territory may be subject to the provisions of the AI Act if they carry out AI-related activities involving EU users or data,” the law firm warned. If it is anything like GDPR, the legislation will have an international impact, especially amid increased EU-U.S. cooperation on AI.

AI tools can land a company in trouble beyond AI legislation. Rubrik declined to share comments with TechCrunch, likely because of its IPO quiet period, but the company’s filing mentions that its AI governance committee evaluates a wide range of risks.

The selection criteria and analysis include consideration of how use of generative AI tools could raise issues relating to confidential information, personal data and privacy, customer data and contractual obligations, open source software, copyright and other intellectual property rights, transparency, output accuracy and reliability, and security.

Keep in mind that Rubrik’s desire to cover legal bases could be due to a variety of other reasons. It could, for example, also be there to show it is responsibly anticipating issues, which is critical since Rubrik has previously dealt with not only a data leak and hack, but also intellectual property litigation.

A matter of optics

Companies won’t solely look at AI through the lens of risk prevention. There will be opportunities they and their clients don’t want to miss. That’s one reason generative AI tools are being implemented despite having obvious flaws like “hallucinations” (i.e. a tendency to fabricate information).

It will be a fine balance for companies to strike. On one hand, boasting about their use of AI could boost their valuations, no matter how real said use is or what difference it makes to their bottom line. On the other hand, they will have to put minds at rest about potential risks.

“We’re at this key point of AI evolution where the future of AI highly depends on whether the public will trust AI systems and companies that use them,” the privacy counsel of privacy and security software provider OneTrust, Adomas Siudika, wrote in a blog post on the topic.

Establishing AI governance committees likely will be at least one way to try to help on the trust front.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Rubrik’s IPO filing hints at thawing public markets for tech companies | TechCrunch


Rubrik, a data cybersecurity company that raised more than a half-billion dollars while private, filed to go public after the bell on Monday. Following quickly on the heels of debuts from Reddit and Astera Labs, the choice by Rubrik to pursue a public offering now could indicate that the IPO market is warming for tech companies.

As a private-market company, Rubrik last raised a lettered round in 2019 when it closed $261 million at a $3.3 billion post-money valuation, according to Crunchbase data. The company could have luck pricing its IPO shares significantly higher than its last primary round. Buyers on the secondary market have bid for shares valuing the company at $6.6 billion in recent months. Secondary data platform Caplight estimates the company’s valuation hovers around $6.3 billion.

Rubrik sells its cloud-based data protection platform to enterprises. As of January, the company had over 1,700 customers with an annual contract value of $100,000 and nearly 100 customers who paid Rubrik over $1 million a year, according to its IPO filing.

Inside Rubrik’s growth

Rubrik initially presents as a moderately growing software business with net losses that stretched to $354 million in its most recent fiscal year.

From its fiscal 2023 to its fiscal 2024, which concluded at the end of January this year, the company’s revenue grew from $599.8 million to $627.9 million, or just under 5%. However, subscription revenue grew 40% over the same period, rising from $385.3 million to $537.9 million.

The growth in its subscription revenue, and not its legacy revenues, is the engine that could propel Rubrik to a successful IPO. The company began life as a software company that sold its product on a perpetual license basis. However, after several years, it began to shift toward a subscription model in its fiscal 2019. It expanded its subscription (SaaS) offerings over time and told investors in its IPO filing that it anticipates that its non-recurring revenues will “continue to decrease,” as it doesn’t generally offer perpetual licenses today.

Rubrik’s transformation to recurring revenues is nearing its completion, with the company reporting that in its most recent quarter — the period ending January 31, 2024 — subscription-related top line comprised 91% of its total revenue. That was up from 73% in the year-ago quarter.

The business model transition from licenses to SaaS can be costly and has weighed on stock prices of other large security companies like Splunk, said Brendan Burke, emerging technology analyst at PitchBook. “Yet Rubrik shares have traded at a 50% premium to the last VC round in secondary markets, suggesting the company will be able to justify a sufficiently high valuation to fund this shift,” he said.

The shift to subscription revenue has helped Rubrik boost its gross margins, which rose from 70% in its fiscal 2023 to 77% in its recently completed fiscal 2024.

However, a growing recurring-revenue software business and improving gross margins have not solved Rubrik’s stiff losses. The company’s net losses grew from 46% of revenue in its fiscal 2023 to 56% in its fiscal 2024, totaling some $354.2 million in the 12 months ending January 31, 2024.

However, despite Rubrik’s steep unprofitability, its cash burn has been comparatively modest. The difference between its net losses and operating cash deficits is not resolved through the excision of expansive share-based compensation; those are single-digit million yearly expenses at the company. Instead, upfront collection of ratable revenue helped Rubrik expand its deferred revenue by hundreds of millions in recent years and limited its net operating cash outflows over the same period.

A Silicon Valley story

Rubrik’s potential IPO could prove a coup for Lightspeed Venture Partners, a well-known Silicon Valley venture capital shop. Bipul Sinha, Rubrik’s co-founder and CEO for the last decade, is a former partner at Lightspeed. The venture capital firm led Rubrik’s Series A, and, per Crunchbase, took part in all its successive funding rounds. Investing in a former partner is not unheard of in venture circles, with some firms even building out founder or entrepreneur-in-residence roles internally. But to see Sinha’s company come to market with 23.9% ownership in the hands of his former employer underscores how personal networks can affect who raises capital in startup land.

Greylock is the other venture firm with the most on the line when it comes to Rubrik’s planned IPO, with its investor Asheem Chandna on the board and ownership of around half of Lightspeed’s stake, or 12.2% of Rubrik’s voting stock, before new shares are sold in the public offering. Greylock led Rubrik’s Series B.

Other investors that led lettered rounds in Rubrik did not meet the 5% threshold required for mandatory inclusion in the company’s S-1 filing, but Enrique Salem from Bain Capital Ventures, which led the company’s Series E, is also present on its board. Other board members include Yvonne Wassenaar, the former CEO of Puppet; Mark McLaughlin, who sits on Snowflake’s board; and John Thompson, another Lightspeed denizen and former Microsoft board member. NBA player and investor Kevin Durant was previously announced as a board adviser at the company, though he is not mentioned in its IPO filing.

The founders are the kind of Silicon Valley A-list that the VC community loves, demonstrating the often incestuous relationships that these tech companies can have with each other through their personal networks. The related third-party disclosures point out that Sinha co-founded another startup called Confluera, where he still sits on the board. In its fiscal 2022, Rubrik spent $124,640 with Confluera. Co-founder Arvind Jain, who remains a major shareholder but has gone to found a new darling AI startup, Glean, is also really well known from his days as an early Google employee. Rubrik reports in its S-1 filing that it spent $356,000 with Glean since April 2021.

While Rubrik notes that its purchases of technology products and services from Confluera and Glean were “negotiated in the ordinary course of business,” they underscore the connections that exist between many Silicon Valley operators. Those same connections can help founders repeat prior successes by buying from and selling to friends and former colleagues. The Rubrik S-1, while not indicating anything untoward, is a reminder that network effects in startup and venture circles are often predicated on relationships and their geographic density in places like Northern California.

What’s on the line

There are more than 1,000 startups in the world today with a valuation of $1 billion or more. Those that are still in fighting shape need to find a way to exit and return capital to their backers. With the IPO market long behind the needed pace to clear those decks, many private-market companies are waiting for a clear starting gun to pursue their own public offerings. If Rubrik can price and trade well in its own debut, it could help other, enterprise-focused software companies that are still unprofitable to also take a shot at going public. That would be welcome news for both founders and venture capitalists alike.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Back
WhatsApp
Messenger
Viber