From Digital Age to Nano Age. WorldWide.

Tag: Rubrik

Robotic Automations

Good news for Rubrik, bad news for TikTok and medium news for early-stage startups | TechCrunch


Rubrik’s strong IPO pricing and warm reception by the public markets after its listing add more weight to the perspective that the public markets are not as closed to tech startups as some thought. If Rubrik’s result isn’t enough to break the logjam, well, maybe there’s something else going on.

But there was a lot more that happened this week, which meant that the Equity crew had a pile of news to get through as always, with a little bit of our own mixed in. Happily it was all pretty darn interesting, so Mary Ann and Alex started with Rubrik before pivoting to Pomelo, a startup that has a very interesting twist on the remittances market.

From there it was time to talk about TikTok. What was once an unfathomable result — TikTok being forced to divest from its parent company or face a ban — became reality pretty darn quickly. The United States is not the first company to ban the service, but we noted during the show that the company we are keeping is not the most enticing. Still, here we are; what does it mean for consumers?

And to close, Early Stage. TechCrunch held its annual early-stage focused event this year, and it was a banger. Not to toot our own horn, but it was the second year in a row that our shindig in Boston was packed, useful and lots of fun. The coffee was even good. At a tech conference. Alex had notes.

Equity is back on Monday, thanks for hanging out with us!

Equity is TechCrunch’s flagship podcast and posts every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and you can subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts.

You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod.

For the full interview transcript, for those who prefer reading over listening, read on, or check out our full archive of episodes over at Simplecast.




Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Rubrik's shares climb 20% in its public debut | TechCrunch


Rubrik shares hit the New York Stock Exchange Thursday debuting at $38 a share. The cybersecurity company priced it shares at $32 apiece Wednesday night, just a hair over its initial target range of $29 to $31 after raising $752 million. This share price gives Rubrik a fully diluted valuation of $6.6 billion, up 88% from its last primary valuation of $3.5 billion in 2019.

Rubrik sells cloud-based security software to enterprise customers and has 1,700 customers with contracts worth more than $100,000 and 100 customers who pay the company more than $1 million a year. The Silicon Valley startup was founded in 2014 and has raised more than $550 million in venture capital, according to Crunchbase data.

The VCs hoping the most that Rubrik’s stock keeps climbing are Lightspeed and Greylock. Lightspeed backed the company in five separate rounds, including leading the company’s Series A round back in 2015. Lightspeed, and those affiliated with it, own 23.9% of Rubrik’s shares prior to the IPO, according the company’s S-1 filing. The firms’ conviction in the company might come from the fact that Rubrik co-founder and CEO, Bipul Sinha, was formerly a partner at Lightspeed from 2010 to 2014. Sinha owns 7.6% of shares.

Greylock holds 12.2% of Rubrik’s shares. The venture firm led the startup’s $41 million Series B round in 2016 and participated in the Series C and Series D rounds as well. Greylock partner Asheem Chandna has sat on the company’s board since 2015.

In addition to Sinha, Rubrik’s other two co-founders hold notable stakes. Arvind Jain, a co-founder who is now the CEO of AI work assistant startup Glean, holds a 7% stake. Arvind Nithrakashyap, co-founder and current Rubrik CTO, holds 6.7%.

Other big-name VCs backed the company, too. Khosla Ventures led Rubrik’s Series C round in 2016; IVP led the company’s Series D round in 2017; and Bain Capital Ventures led the company’s Series E round in 2019. It’s unclear what percentage of shares these firms still own, but it’s under 5%, as none of these investors were named in the company’s S-1. NBA All-Star Kevin Durant’s Thirty Five Ventures was also an investor.

The results of Rubrik’s IPO are under more scrutiny than some of the other recent public listings, because Rubrik’s debut looks more like a 2021 IPO and less like the other 2024 IPOs. Ibotta debuted as a profitable company. Astera Labs and Reddit both had recently swung to a GAAP net profit. Rubrik, however, is as an unprofitable business seeing its losses continue to grow, not shrink.

The company reported that its revenue grew a little under 5% from its fiscal 2023 year to its fiscal 2024 year, growing from $599.8 million to $627.9 million. At the same time, the company’s losses continued to grow: Its net losses grew from 46% in its fiscal 2023 to 56% in its fiscal 2024 year.

The company’s metrics do have a bright spot, however: subscription revenue. In the company’s most recent fiscal quarter, subscriptions made up 91% of the revenue, up from 73% a year prior. Subscription revenue tends to be sticky, and growth there could explain why some investors are more confident about the future prospects of Rubrik despite its current losses and lack of profitability.

Rubrik is the fourth venture-backed company to go public in recent months as investors seem eager to reopen the IPO market. All three companies that went before Rubrik — Ibotta, Reddit and Astera Labs — popped on the first day of trading and have all since settled, some in better positions than others. But none has been a disaster or negative omen for other potential IPOs this year.

While four positive IPO debuts could spark more companies to come off of the sidelines, the current guidance that interest rate cuts may not come as early in 2024 as many had predicted may put a damper on the the IPO market’s recent momentum.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Rubrik’s IPO filing reveals an AI governance committee. Get used to it. | TechCrunch


Tucked into Rubrik’s IPO filing this week — between the parts about employee count and cost statements — was a nugget that reveals how the data management company is thinking about generative AI and the risks that accompany the new tech: Rubrik has quietly set up a governance committee to oversee how artificial intelligence is implemented in its business.

According to the Form S-1, the new AI governance committee includes managers from Rubrik’s engineering, product, legal and information security teams. Together, the teams will evaluate the potential legal, security and business risks of using generative AI tools and ponder “steps that can be taken to mitigate any such risks,” the filing reads.

To be clear, Rubrik is not an AI business at its core — its sole AI product, a chatbot called Ruby that it launched in November 2023, is built on Microsoft and OpenAI APIs. But like many others, Rubrik (and its current and future investors) is considering a future in which AI will play a growing role in its business. Here’s why we should expect more moves like this going forward.

Growing regulatory scrutiny

Some companies are adopting AI best practices to take the initiative, but others will be pushed to do so by regulations such as the EU AI Act.

Dubbed “the world’s first comprehensive AI law,” the landmark legislation — expected to become law across the bloc later this year — bans some AI use cases that are deemed to bring “unacceptable risk,” and defines other “high risk” applications. The bill also lays out governance rules aimed at reducing risks that might scale harms like bias and discrimination. This risk-rating approach is likely to be broadly adopted by companies looking for a reasoned way forward for adopting AI.

Privacy and data protection lawyer Eduardo Ustaran, a partner at Hogan Lovells International LLP, expects the EU AI Act and its myriad obligations to amplify the need for AI governance, which will in turn require committees. “Aside from its strategic role to devise and oversee an AI governance program, from an operational perspective, AI governance committees are a key tool in addressing and minimizing risks,” he said. “This is because collectively, a properly established and resourced committee should be able to anticipate all areas of risk and work with the business to deal with them before they materialize. In a sense, an AI governance committee will serve as a basis for all other governance efforts and provide much-needed reassurance to avoid compliance gaps.”

In a recent policy paper on the EU AI Act’s implications for corporate governance, ESG and compliance consultant Katharina Miller concurred, recommending that companies establish AI governance committees as a compliance measure.

Legal scrutiny

Compliance isn’t only meant to please regulators. The EU AI Act has teeth, and “the penalties for non-compliance with the AI Act are significant,” British-American law firm Norton Rose Fulbright noted.

Its scope also goes beyond Europe. “Companies operating outside the EU territory may be subject to the provisions of the AI Act if they carry out AI-related activities involving EU users or data,” the law firm warned. If it is anything like GDPR, the legislation will have an international impact, especially amid increased EU-U.S. cooperation on AI.

AI tools can land a company in trouble beyond AI legislation. Rubrik declined to share comments with TechCrunch, likely because of its IPO quiet period, but the company’s filing mentions that its AI governance committee evaluates a wide range of risks.

The selection criteria and analysis include consideration of how use of generative AI tools could raise issues relating to confidential information, personal data and privacy, customer data and contractual obligations, open source software, copyright and other intellectual property rights, transparency, output accuracy and reliability, and security.

Keep in mind that Rubrik’s desire to cover legal bases could be due to a variety of other reasons. It could, for example, also be there to show it is responsibly anticipating issues, which is critical since Rubrik has previously dealt with not only a data leak and hack, but also intellectual property litigation.

A matter of optics

Companies won’t solely look at AI through the lens of risk prevention. There will be opportunities they and their clients don’t want to miss. That’s one reason generative AI tools are being implemented despite having obvious flaws like “hallucinations” (i.e. a tendency to fabricate information).

It will be a fine balance for companies to strike. On one hand, boasting about their use of AI could boost their valuations, no matter how real said use is or what difference it makes to their bottom line. On the other hand, they will have to put minds at rest about potential risks.

“We’re at this key point of AI evolution where the future of AI highly depends on whether the public will trust AI systems and companies that use them,” the privacy counsel of privacy and security software provider OneTrust, Adomas Siudika, wrote in a blog post on the topic.

Establishing AI governance committees likely will be at least one way to try to help on the trust front.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

From YC to IPO: Winter 2024 Demo Day, Rubrik and Ibotta | TechCrunch


What a week, everyone. Two full days of Y Combinator demo day activity kept us busy, but the latest accelerator cohort’s launch was far from the only big story in startup land. Today on TechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Mary Ann, Becca and Alex gathered to dig into favorites from the hundreds of new YC companies that pitched, and a venture capital fund that wants to become “the investment and innovation arm of the autism community.”

Becca wanted to talk about Seso and its fascinating fintech play in the agricultural space, while Alex brought Home From College and its recent seed round to the mix.

Then to close out, we chatted through the impending Ibotta and Rubrik IPOs. The latter deal could provide a fascinating heat-check for unprofitable unicorns that need to find some sort of exit, and quickly. All told we chatted through startups from their very earliest form all the way through their most mature. A very fitting capstone to the week!

Equity is TechCrunch’s flagship podcast and posts every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. You can subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts.

You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod.

For the full interview transcript, for those who prefer reading over listening, read on, or check out our full archive of episodes over at Simplecast.




Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Rubrik’s IPO filing hints at thawing public markets for tech companies | TechCrunch


Rubrik, a data cybersecurity company that raised more than a half-billion dollars while private, filed to go public after the bell on Monday. Following quickly on the heels of debuts from Reddit and Astera Labs, the choice by Rubrik to pursue a public offering now could indicate that the IPO market is warming for tech companies.

As a private-market company, Rubrik last raised a lettered round in 2019 when it closed $261 million at a $3.3 billion post-money valuation, according to Crunchbase data. The company could have luck pricing its IPO shares significantly higher than its last primary round. Buyers on the secondary market have bid for shares valuing the company at $6.6 billion in recent months. Secondary data platform Caplight estimates the company’s valuation hovers around $6.3 billion.

Rubrik sells its cloud-based data protection platform to enterprises. As of January, the company had over 1,700 customers with an annual contract value of $100,000 and nearly 100 customers who paid Rubrik over $1 million a year, according to its IPO filing.

Inside Rubrik’s growth

Rubrik initially presents as a moderately growing software business with net losses that stretched to $354 million in its most recent fiscal year.

From its fiscal 2023 to its fiscal 2024, which concluded at the end of January this year, the company’s revenue grew from $599.8 million to $627.9 million, or just under 5%. However, subscription revenue grew 40% over the same period, rising from $385.3 million to $537.9 million.

The growth in its subscription revenue, and not its legacy revenues, is the engine that could propel Rubrik to a successful IPO. The company began life as a software company that sold its product on a perpetual license basis. However, after several years, it began to shift toward a subscription model in its fiscal 2019. It expanded its subscription (SaaS) offerings over time and told investors in its IPO filing that it anticipates that its non-recurring revenues will “continue to decrease,” as it doesn’t generally offer perpetual licenses today.

Rubrik’s transformation to recurring revenues is nearing its completion, with the company reporting that in its most recent quarter — the period ending January 31, 2024 — subscription-related top line comprised 91% of its total revenue. That was up from 73% in the year-ago quarter.

The business model transition from licenses to SaaS can be costly and has weighed on stock prices of other large security companies like Splunk, said Brendan Burke, emerging technology analyst at PitchBook. “Yet Rubrik shares have traded at a 50% premium to the last VC round in secondary markets, suggesting the company will be able to justify a sufficiently high valuation to fund this shift,” he said.

The shift to subscription revenue has helped Rubrik boost its gross margins, which rose from 70% in its fiscal 2023 to 77% in its recently completed fiscal 2024.

However, a growing recurring-revenue software business and improving gross margins have not solved Rubrik’s stiff losses. The company’s net losses grew from 46% of revenue in its fiscal 2023 to 56% in its fiscal 2024, totaling some $354.2 million in the 12 months ending January 31, 2024.

However, despite Rubrik’s steep unprofitability, its cash burn has been comparatively modest. The difference between its net losses and operating cash deficits is not resolved through the excision of expansive share-based compensation; those are single-digit million yearly expenses at the company. Instead, upfront collection of ratable revenue helped Rubrik expand its deferred revenue by hundreds of millions in recent years and limited its net operating cash outflows over the same period.

A Silicon Valley story

Rubrik’s potential IPO could prove a coup for Lightspeed Venture Partners, a well-known Silicon Valley venture capital shop. Bipul Sinha, Rubrik’s co-founder and CEO for the last decade, is a former partner at Lightspeed. The venture capital firm led Rubrik’s Series A, and, per Crunchbase, took part in all its successive funding rounds. Investing in a former partner is not unheard of in venture circles, with some firms even building out founder or entrepreneur-in-residence roles internally. But to see Sinha’s company come to market with 23.9% ownership in the hands of his former employer underscores how personal networks can affect who raises capital in startup land.

Greylock is the other venture firm with the most on the line when it comes to Rubrik’s planned IPO, with its investor Asheem Chandna on the board and ownership of around half of Lightspeed’s stake, or 12.2% of Rubrik’s voting stock, before new shares are sold in the public offering. Greylock led Rubrik’s Series B.

Other investors that led lettered rounds in Rubrik did not meet the 5% threshold required for mandatory inclusion in the company’s S-1 filing, but Enrique Salem from Bain Capital Ventures, which led the company’s Series E, is also present on its board. Other board members include Yvonne Wassenaar, the former CEO of Puppet; Mark McLaughlin, who sits on Snowflake’s board; and John Thompson, another Lightspeed denizen and former Microsoft board member. NBA player and investor Kevin Durant was previously announced as a board adviser at the company, though he is not mentioned in its IPO filing.

The founders are the kind of Silicon Valley A-list that the VC community loves, demonstrating the often incestuous relationships that these tech companies can have with each other through their personal networks. The related third-party disclosures point out that Sinha co-founded another startup called Confluera, where he still sits on the board. In its fiscal 2022, Rubrik spent $124,640 with Confluera. Co-founder Arvind Jain, who remains a major shareholder but has gone to found a new darling AI startup, Glean, is also really well known from his days as an early Google employee. Rubrik reports in its S-1 filing that it spent $356,000 with Glean since April 2021.

While Rubrik notes that its purchases of technology products and services from Confluera and Glean were “negotiated in the ordinary course of business,” they underscore the connections that exist between many Silicon Valley operators. Those same connections can help founders repeat prior successes by buying from and selling to friends and former colleagues. The Rubrik S-1, while not indicating anything untoward, is a reminder that network effects in startup and venture circles are often predicated on relationships and their geographic density in places like Northern California.

What’s on the line

There are more than 1,000 startups in the world today with a valuation of $1 billion or more. Those that are still in fighting shape need to find a way to exit and return capital to their backers. With the IPO market long behind the needed pace to clear those decks, many private-market companies are waiting for a clear starting gun to pursue their own public offerings. If Rubrik can price and trade well in its own debut, it could help other, enterprise-focused software companies that are still unprofitable to also take a shot at going public. That would be welcome news for both founders and venture capitalists alike.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Back
WhatsApp
Messenger
Viber