From Digital Age to Nano Age. WorldWide.

Tag: Exclusive

Robotic Automations

Honeycomb Insurance grabs $36M Series B from solo VC-led Zeev Ventures | TechCrunch


When Itai Ben-Zaken’s first startup failed in 2018, the former BCG consultant and Wharton MBA spent months trying to understand what he could have done differently during the five years he ran the company. After analyzing most of his major decisions, he concluded that while Comprendi, a digital ad recommendation business, was an interesting offering, […]

© 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Scammers found planting online betting ads on Indian government websites | TechCrunch


Some Indian government websites have allowed scammers to plant advertisements capable of redirecting visitors to online betting platforms. TechCrunch discovered around four dozen “gov.in” website links associated with Indian states, including Bihar, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala, Mizoram and Telangana that were redirecting to online betting platforms. Some of those websites belong to state police and property […]

© 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Exclusive: SafeBase taps AI to automate software security reviews


Entrepreneurs Al Yang and Adar Arnon met at Harvard Business School and quickly realized that they had an interest in common: cybersecurity.

“We’ve witnessed an evolving business climate that brought along with it an unprecedented need for improved security processes,” Arnon told TechCrunch. “Security’s importance has increased exponentially … [it’s] non-negotiable for technology buyers.”

Yang and Arnon decided to turn this interest into something more, so they started SafeBase, which was accepted into Y Combinator’s accelerator program during the pandemic.

SafeBase on Tuesday announced that it raised $33 million in a Series B round led by Touring Capital. The company helps customers fill out security questionnaires, which are reviews organizations normally kick off before buying a new piece of software. It’s a governance and compliance thing.

Security questionnaires can be painstaking, taking teams weeks to months to complete for more complex pieces of software. But Arnon makes the case that SafeBase can save time through automation — and AI.

SafeBase employs AI models “specifically trained on security documentation use cases” to read, interpret security information and questions and then automatically respond to security questionnaires. “[Our platform] takes the pain out of the cumbersome security review process by empowering security, governance, risk and compliance and revenue teams,” he said.

Image Credits: SafeBase

Being the cynic about AI I am, I asked Arnon about the accuracy of these models; AI is a notorious liar, after all. He claimed that it’s superior thanks to a “mix of large and small language models” that deliver “greater answer coverage.” Take that how you will.

Beyond the custom models, SafeBase provides an engine that allows a company to assign “rules-based behavior” for customer access, as well as dashboards that show insights and analytics on the company’s security posture.

SafeBase isn’t the only vendor out there offering tools to automate security questionnaires and reviews. Rivals include Conveyor, which recently raised $12.5 million; Kintent; and Quilt, which claims that it can also automate due diligence reviews in addition to security reviews.

Arnon didn’t seem too worried. Perhaps that’s because of SafeBase’s 700-company-strong customer roster, which includes Palantir, LinkedIn, Asana and Instacart.

“SafeBase saw massive growth in the past couple of years,” Arnon said. “Customers love the product and adoption continues to accelerate. The company benefits from increased visibility across its vendor network as more and more high-volume customers launch trust centers that replace the need for tens of thousands of manual security reviews.”

SafeBase, which is based in San Francisco, has 55 employees.

The company’s Series B had the participation of strategic investor Zoom Ventures (Zoom’s corporate venture arm), NEA, Y Combinator, Comcast Ventures and Cerca Partners as well as angels including former Salesforce chief trust officer Jim Alkove. It brings SafeBase’s total raised to over $50 million; Arnon says a significant portion will be put toward expanding the team.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Bloom is reinventing how e-bikes are made in the US | TechCrunch


The pandemic ushered in an e-bike boom. But like so many other pandemic trends, that boom didn’t last.

The last year has seen e-bike startups VanMoof and Cake file for bankruptcy amid a backdrop of micromobility doom and gloom. Tier and Dott merged. Superpedestrian closed up shop. Bird also had to go through a restructuring.

All of those startups might have had different goals, but their problems were fairly similar. Bloom, a new Detroit-based startup, thinks it has the answer: take on all the hard, behind-the-scenes work and let these startups focus on the exciting stuff, like product design and branding.

It’s an idea that founders Chris Nolte and Justin Kosmides are so passionate about that they packed up and moved to Detroit to build it — Nolte with his 1-year old child and spouse in tow, and Kosmides with his four-pawed companion Artie.

It’s proving popular, too; their customer list is as long as a CVS receipt.

“Everybody’s trying to reinvent the wheel,” Nolte tells TechCrunch in a recent interview. “But the reality is there are proven systems, and people waste a lot of money on making mistakes, making the wrong decisions.”

The “silly and scary” flood of VC money into the space over the last few years caused a lot of waste and collateral damage, Kosmides tells TechCrunch. Bloom is the pair’s answer to cleaning some of that up.

Founded last year, Bloom plans to offer a few core services: contract manufacturing, assembly, shipping and logistics and service. Each of these are tasks that startups would previously have to find individual partners for or take on in house, both of which increase costs and put pressure on the bottom lines. It’s those extra undertakings that can doom a startup.

“I remember saying, ‘who’s crazy enough to listen to this crazy idea that I have,” Kosmides exclaimed. “And I went to Chris, and I pitched him, and he was like: ‘Oh, I’ve been thinking about this for so long.”

It may have seemed crazy at the time, but Nolte says around 30 companies are set to start working with Bloom in the near-term. Kosmides says there are more than 100 in the pipeline ranging from startups that are just past the prototyping stage to “very mature” players.

A lot of this will happen at a production space in Michigan, though the duo plans to work with partners in California, Ohio, South Carolina and New York. The goal is to launch a 200,000-square-foot facility in Detroit with distribution and assembly capabilities.

They’ve accomplished this with little outreach, and a team of just about 10 people — though they plan to roughly double that headcount as they close their first funding round.

If all goes well, Nolte and Kosmides hope to not only help these companies build better businesses, but also establish more standards for an industry that is currently very scattered.

A shared passion

Nolte is an e-bike veteran. In fact, he got into e-bikes when Barack Obama was still president.

He’s also an actual veteran. Nolte did a tour in the U.S. Army in Iraq where he drove fuel trucks. He then learned about pedal-assist e-bikes after a back injury. He loved the tech and the idea of helping wrestle the country away from oil dependency.

“We’re continually dependent on foreign oil,” he says. “I really started to believe in this idea that using more human-scale transportation could help to mitigate the need to participate in these [conflicts].”

Nolte started as an early leader in the space called Propel Bikes. He also started a YouTube channel in 2019 to educate people about the industry.

“I ended up doing a lot of factory tours” for the channel, he says.”I was like, well, why are there so many factories in Europe, but there are really practically none in the U.S. for bikes and micromobility?”

Kosmides also co-founded an e-bike company called Vela in 2020, after nearly 10 years at Barclays Investment Bank. He remembers looking at the micromobility industry and thinking: “We’re financing these companies and these vehicles all incorrectly.” (Vela is now operated by a new group that is trying to leverage Bloom’s network, he says.)

The industry was “over-funding companies that, maybe their Instagrams were really good, and they were really good at marketing, but their product and their development and their sales just wasn’t there,” he says.

Last year, the two realized they were both looking for ways to solve the problems that were starting to plague some of the best-known micromobility companies.

The duo found a home base with Newlab at the new mobility innovation district in Detroit’s Michigan Central.

It’s only been a year, but there has been a lot of bloodshed from the time they set out to start Bloom. One of the most notable failures happened at premium e-bike maker VanMoof. It filed for bankruptcy last July, leaving thousands of customers uncertain about the operability of their connected bike. Scooter-sharing company Bird, once valued at more than $2 billion, filed for bankruptcy in December. (Both companies ultimately emerged from bankruptcy under new ownership.)

The trouble continued into early 2024, when boutique electric motorcycle and bike outfit Cake filed for bankruptcy so suddenly that it sold its US inventory to a mobility shop owner in Florida. (That man is now one of Bloom’s customers.)

All this devastation meant the timing was perfect for Bloom.

“We couldn’t be doing this two or three years ago. Everyone was concerned about getting products off the shelves as quickly as possible,” Kosmides says. “But now we’re having this moment where everyone’s asking, ‘How do we not make the same mistakes?”

Image Credits: Dust Moto

Bloom customers

One of the first to take the leap with Bloom is, perhaps unsurprisingly, a startup that wants to make products for thrill-seekers.

Colin Godby co-founded Dust Moto in 2023 in an attempt to not only help bring electrification to dirt bikes, but also fill a gap by creating an American brand in the space — something that hasn’t really existed thanks to the dominance of Japanese brands like Honda and Yamaha.

Until now, Dust has only made a few initial prototypes. But they are contracting with Bloom to use its production space in Detroit to build the next group of production-intent bikes. Dust will also leverage Bloom for final assembly, quality control, and fulfillment.

The difference of having Bloom help with all those parts of the process versus doing it alone or finding individual partners, Godby says, can be measured in millions of dollars.

“Instead of needing to raise $40 million for us to build our first dirt bike, it’s on the order of sort of $5 [million] to $10 million raised to be able to bring this awesome product to market,” he says.

It’s also less burdensome.

“If it’s us handling it, everything is on us, you know what I mean? Like, I gotta hire more people, we’ve got to work more hours,” Godby says. “If it’s shared with Bloom… like the success of their company depends on them being able to nail this.”

That trust wasn’t immediate. Dust got started before Bloom had really engaged with many prospective customers. After meeting with them late last year, Godby says he was wary of stacking “startup risk on top of startup risk.” But the idea clicked when he realized how other industries rely on these types of intermediary companies.

“Honestly, if I’m thinking about the most fun way to spend my time at Dust, it’s not building a production environment, you know?” he says. “And you look at the various mature industries, whether it’s aerospace or automotive, tier one suppliers and all these sorts of things, that is how the game works.”

Scott Colosimo is on the other end of the spectrum, as far as Bloom’s early partners go. He spent more than a decade as CEO of a global motorcycle company called Cleveland CycleWerks. Colosimo tells TechCrunch he was trying to “transition softly” from a gas vehicle company to an electric one.

“It became very apparent, very quickly, that that’s like taking a baker and turning them into a surgeon,” he says. “It’s just different.”

He walked away from the gas motorcycle business entirely and started up Land, which is nominally an electric motorcycle company. But it’s also, somewhat sneakily, an energy company as well, built around the connected, removable battery that powers the bikes.

Land is headed in this direction because Colosimo says there’s a massive opportunity, especially given the often sad state of e-bike batteries. And Bloom, he says, makes it that much easier to try.

Colosimo says he’s talking with Bloom about manufacturing future bikes, mostly because Land already has a space in his hometown of Cleveland, Ohio that’s tooled up and ready to build the first run. What he really wants to do with Bloom, then, is scale that battery platform designed at Land and make it available for other companies.

“If we lived in a perfect world, I would love to put $100 million into a bank account and just focus on the batteries, so in three years, we have a viable product,” he says. “The VCs aren’t willing to deploy $100 million for the hope that you’re going to unicorn in three years. So the vehicles that we’re making right now are very much our own VC. The vehicles currently spin off a small margin. It helps push the battery platform.”

“Right now, for e-bikes, when the batteries are bad, you throw the whole fucking thing away. It’s not sustainable,” he says.

In turn, Colosimo says he’s been referring a bunch of other prospective customers to Bloom. “I just started saying, ‘Hey, if you don’t have your manufacturing figured out, there’s Justin and Chris, and there’s this team — they’re doing what you need,” he says. “If that wasn’t an option, it was: they’re all gonna go to China.”

Image Credits: Land Moto

USA! USA!

While it’s a tempting narrative, Nolte and Kosmides say Bloom is not just some nationalistic manufacturing play. It’s more about filling the obvious needs if companies like the ones they’ve already run are going to succeed at scale — or have a chance at trying something new at smaller scale.

“It’s not a whole, like, ‘let’s do it in America because America is the best’ thing,” Nolte says. “So many companies would love to have options for domestic assembly and manufacturing. But there’s there’s very little out there.”

Kosmides, who says he was touring European bicycle factories when this whole “crazy” idea first hit him, says he remembers thinking: “Why aren’t we even doing a basic amount of this in the U.S.?”

Now the hard work begins.

“We’re not trying to compete with Asia,” Nolte says. “But I think we do need to make our best shot to be competitive with these different places. And if we’re going to do that, we really have to put our best foot forward.”


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Electricity Maps calculates the carbon intensity of electricity consumption to optimize usage at scale | TechCrunch


If you’re an electricity nerd, chances are you’ve already spent quite a few hours looking at Electricity Maps and its mesmerizing export flow animations. This open-source data visualization project has been around since 2016. But companies like Google and Samsung are increasingly relying on this rich data set to hit their sustainability goals and empower their own users.

There are currently 20 people working for Electricity Maps and the company has been profitable for a few years. But TechCrunch has exclusively learned it recently raised a $5.4 million (€5M) funding round from Transition and Revent, to take things up a notch by investing in the product and the business. Electricity Maps is now both a data visualization tool and an enterprise API for data-driven decarbonization — and one wouldn’t work without the other.

Founded by Olivier Corradi, a French and Danish entrepreneur and data scientist who previously worked for voice assistant startup Snips, Electricity Maps started from an itch to know more about electricity production and consumption. “There were articles in the press saying that Denmark ran on 100% renewable energy for a day. So I was wondering whether this was true and how long it lasted — how many hours in the day,” Corradi told TechCrunch.

Image Credits: Electricity Maps

Electricity Maps aggregates real-time data for electricity production in more than 50 countries around the world. While the company uses open-data sources, employees and community contributors had to build dozens of parsers to standardize this data.

As renewable energy depends on weather conditions (for wind and solar energy in particular), the mix of energy sources constantly evolves. It means that the carbon intensity of the energy produced also changes with the time of the day and the current conditions. And, as you may have guessed, as electricity works a bit like tap water flowing through a vast network of tubes, the CO2 emissions related to the electricity you consume can vary greatly.

Calculating the CO2 emissions can be complicated as there are also a lot of cross-border flows for electricity — some countries produce more electricity than they actually consume while others have larger electricity needs than production capacity. Electricity Maps has designed its own flow-tracing model to understand which power plant contributes to the electricity you’re consuming right now.

“We’re going to process all this in our system with what we call a flow-tracing algorithm, which lets us tell you where the electricity is coming from depending on where you are. It can be produced locally, but it can also come from Germany. But Germany imports from Poland, so it could potentially come from Poland, etc. So we need to perform some modelling,” Corradi said.

The company also stores historical data and uses machine learning algorithms to provide 24-hour forecasts. Just like weather APIs are now a big industry, electricity forecasting APIs could become essential business tools in the future.

Electricity Maps founder and CEO Olivier Corradi (Image Credits: Electricity Maps)

From carbon intensity to load shifting

The reason why the open-source data visualization project is an essential part of the company is because Electricity Maps wants to achieve as much consensus as possible. Calculating the lifecycle emissions for electricity generation requires peer reviewed studies.

The company shares all its sources for emission factors. It also means that these calculation methods can evolve over time as researchers release new studies with more accurate results. The community can discuss and submit potential changes that will be reflected in Electricity Maps’ data.

As for the commercial part, being able to know the carbon intensity of the electricity that is available at a specific place and a specific time can be a sort of super power.

“With all the renewable energy installation goals, we’re going to find ourselves in a world where the quantity of intermittent renewable energy will triple by 2030,” Corradi said.

“The good thing is that this demand is flexible because it’s going to be electric cars and you can change the time at which they charge. It’s going to be AI training and you can choose the time at which you’re going to train these big models,” he added.

Image Credits: Electricity Maps

Google, one of Electricity Maps’ most important clients, partnered with the European startup to calculate the carbon intensity of the electricity powering its data centers.

For some tasks, such as indexing the web or training a new AI model, Google can use Electricity Maps’ data for load shifting. When there’s more wind, it’s time to boot up additional servers. Or when it’s nighttime in the U.S., Google can move some compute-intensive operations to European data centers.

But Google’s own clients will also benefit from the company’s partnership with Electricity Maps. With the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, many companies will soon have to publish carbon accounting reports. As many companies rely on Google Cloud for their hosting needs, they will need data to calculate their scope 3 emissions. Thanks to Electricity Maps’ historical data, that carbon data will be more accurate.

Samsung, another client for Electricity Maps, uses the startup’s data to show users the electricity usage and carbon footprint of their Samsung devices. In that case, this is more about educating users.

But Electricity Maps is much more than an educational tool. It can act as the information layer that decides whether it’s a good time to turn on millions of electric devices — or, at least, if it’s a good time to have as little impact as possible on the planet.

Why is a profitable company raising? The funding injection is aimed at dialling up Electricity Maps’ own impact by stepping on the gas so it can meet rising demand for smarter climate tools, per Corradi. “The reason we raised is simply that the amount of renewable energy now in the system is starting to be so significant that you’re starting to have an opportunity to activate the flexibility of the appliances you have at home, or in the industrial sector.”


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Fisker stiffed the engineering firm developing its low-cost EV and pickup truck, lawsuit claims | TechCrunch


Henrik Fisker stood on a stage last August and proudly debuted two prototypes designed to catapult his eponymous EV startup Fisker into the mainstream. There was the Pear, a low-cost EV meant for the masses, and the Alaska, Fisker’s entry into the red-hot pickup truck market.

In the weeks that followed, Fisker stopped paying the engineering firm that helped develop those vehicles, according to a previously-unreported lawsuit filed in federal court this week. The firm, a U.S. subsidiary of German engineering giant Bertrandt AG, also accuses Fisker of wrongfully holding onto IP associated with those vehicles. It’s asking for around $13 million in damages.

The lawsuit adds to a pile of legal trouble facing Fisker, which is on the brink of bankruptcy. At least 30 lawsuits alleging lemon law violations have been filed, a handful of which Fisker has already settled. A former director has filed a proposed class action claiming unpaid wages. A textile supplier has also sued Fisker for more than $1 million that it alleges the EV startup never paid.

The engineering lawsuit stands out amid the legal trouble because it suggests that financial cracks were already forming inside Fisker last August despite the bold claims its CEO made on that stage.

“The lawsuit filed by Bertrandt is without merit,” Matthew DeBord, Fisker’s vice president of communications, said in an email to TechCrunch. “It is a legally baseless and disappointing attempt by what has been a valued partner to extract from Fisker payments and intellectual property to which Bertrandt has no right to under the relevant agreements or otherwise.” He declined to comment on the other cases.

Bertrandt says in the complaint filed in Michigan Eastern District Court that it entered into a “design and development agreement” with Fisker in May 2022 to perform “engineering, design, and development services” on the Pear – a contract worth north of $35 million, according to a copy of the design and development agreement attached to the lawsuit. (The agreement also shows that Fisker had previously hired Bertrandt to perform a feasibility study, cost analysis, timing proposal and other items for the Pear EV.)

At some point after entering into the agreement, Bertrandt says Fisker asked it to do similar work in connection with the Alaska pickup truck. Bertrandt says in the complaint that a formal written agreement was never executed with Fisker for the Alaska, but that it provided a quote of $1.66 million that Fisker agreed to pay.

Fisker stopped paying Bertrandt at the end of August 2023, according to the complaint. The company continued to fail to pay invoices through January 31, 2024, bringing the total unpaid to $7,061,443. The engineering firm also claims that Fisker’s decision to put the development work on the Pear and Alaska EVs on “pause” is an additional breach of the contract as it caused Bertrandt to suffer delay costs.

Bertrandt says it had a meeting with Fisker on February 6, 2024 where the EV startup “acknowledged its liability for payment of these invoices and agreed to promptly pay $3,685,000 as a partial payment” – but then never made that payment.

Breaching the contract, according to Bertrandt, has cost the engineering firm an additional $5,858,000 in “lost profits, delay costs, and incidental damages,” which is why it’s seeking $12,919,443 in total damages.

What’s more, the firm says it demanded on April 22 that Fisker “return all of Bertrandt’s intellectual property” and “certify in writing that Fisker had not retained any hard copies or electronic copies,” and claims the EV startup has “failed to do either.”

“Fisker has been unjustly enriched at the expense of Bertrandt,” lawyers for the firm write in the complaint.

Bertrandt isn’t the only supplier to sue Fisker so far.

Georgia-based Corinthian Textiles sued Fisker in Los Angeles Superior Court in early April. The supplier claims it entered into an agreement with the EV startup in early 2023 to provide it with “customized products for use in Fisker’s automobiles.” It doesn’t specify what products it made for Fisker, but the company’s website says its automotive division specializes in floor, trunk and cargo mats, as well as “automotive carpet.”

Corinthian says Fisker “refused, and continue[s] to refuse” to pay invoices and other fees in the amount of $1,077,571.75.

Working overtime

Days before Bertrandt sued in federal court, Robert Lee, an employee who worked for Fisker from October 2023 to March 5, 2024, filed a proposed class action in Los Angeles Superior Court alleging a pattern of overworking employees and not properly compensating them. The suit also claims Fisker failed to reimburse expenses and pay out wages owed when employees separated from the company.

Lee claims that he and other hourly employees worked “well over” eight hours a day and 40 hours per week, and instead often worked over 12 hours per day. He claims they were “frequently compelled” to work weekends. Fisker did not compensate employees for that additional time, according to the complaint. Lee also claims Fisker failed to properly track hours worked, and even deducted commissions from their hourly pay.

He claims employees were “regularly compelled to work off the clock and [Fisker Inc] created a policy to account for less hours than the total amount of hours actually worked” in order to “meet certain goals, to generate more sales.”

Lee also claims Fisker “effectively coerced and pressured its non-exempt employees to work of-the-clock, have their wages deducted, have their wages miscalculated, to shorten (tantamount to a missed meal period) or forego meal and rest periods (or not be paid for their rest breaks).”

Lemons

Fisker started getting peppered with lawsuits in California alleging that it was violating the state’s lemon law as early as last November, which TechCrunch previously reported. The company has started to settle some of those earlier lawsuits in what roughly amounts to buying back the vehicles, according to court filings and a person familiar with the settlements.

More lemon law lawsuits have continued to pour in across state, where Fisker has delivered the bulk of its cars in the United States.

Customers may have taken action in other states where Fisker has delivered cars, like New York, Florida and Massachusetts. Those states require that lemon law disputes run through arbitration, making it difficult to know just how many actions may be pending against the company.

In its recent annual filing for 2023, Fisker noted that it is still defending against a proposed class action lawsuit from shareholders alleging violations of securities laws. Fisker then goes on to vaguely say that “[v]arious other legal actions, claims, and proceedings are pending against the Company, including, but not limited to, matters arising out of alleged product defects; employment-related matters; product warranties; and consumer protection laws.”

It also implied that it has been contacted by unnamed government agencies for information about its business, including subpoenas, in a new line of text that it had never included in any of its prior SEC filings.

“The Company also from time to time receives subpoenas and other inquiries or requests for information from agencies or other representatives of U.S. federal, state, and foreign governments,” the company wrote. DeBord, the communications VP, told TechCrunch that Fisker “currently [has] no pending subpoenas from governments.”

Correction: The article incorrectly identified Robert Lee as Fisker’s former director of technical services. The Lee who filed the lawsuit is an employee who worked for Fisker from October 2023 to March 5, 2024. The article has been corrected. 


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Exclusive: Sprinklr lays off more than 100 employees


Sprinklr, a U.S. firm offering a customer experience management platform to global brands, has laid off about 3% of its workforce — around 116 people — to realign its customer operations team, the company confirmed to TechCrunch in a statement. The new job cuts come over a year after the company cut about 4% of its headcount in February last year.

The New York-headquartered company, which counts Microsoft, Samsung, P&G and over 60% of the Fortune 100 companies globally as customers, started notifying affected employees in markets including the U.S. and India about its decision on Thursday, TechCrunch exclusively learned and confirmed with the company through an email.

“Sprinklr made the strategic business decision to realign our headcount across our customer operations organization,” a company spokesperson said. “While these decisions are hard to make, they reflect the commitments we’ve outlined to restructure our business to accelerate our go-to-market efficiencies and better serve customers.”

The spokesperson confirmed that the job cuts did not affect C-level roles.

Sprinklr did not disclose the exact number of employees being laid off. According to its recent 10K filing (PDF), the company had 3,869 employees worldwide as of January 31. Of the total workforce, Sprinklr had 2,276 employees in India, 787 in the U.S. and 3,082 internationally.

“The restructuring will be done in accordance with local and country laws. This difficult, but necessary, action ensures we are aligned to our prioritized growth areas while supporting customers where they live and operate,” the spokesperson stated.

In March, Sprinklr reported a 17% year-on-year increase in its quarterly revenue for Q4 to $194.2 million from $165.3 million a year ago. The company also garnered GAAP operating income of $18.5 million compared to an operating loss of $1.8 million a year ago.

“While we will continue to hire in prioritized areas to support our growth, scale, and long-term success, our first priority is to support employees with the greatest care and respect, show appreciation for their contributions to Sprinklr, and to assist them in their transition. We will then continue our focus on strengthening our foundation, fostering innovation and enhancing our execution to drive value for our customers and shareholders,” the spokesperson said.

On Friday, Sprinklr was trading at $12.10 per share with a market cap of $3.30 billion.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

EXCLUSIVE: NASA is expanding its Wallops Island facility to support three times as many launches


NASA is kicking off a formal environmental assessment of its facilities on Wallops Island, Virginia, to increase the number of authorized rocket launches at the site by almost 200%, according to slides and recordings of an April 29 internal meeting viewed by TechCrunch.

The proposed changes could help ease congestion at the country’s other spaceports, which have felt the strain of a rapid increase in launch capacity due primarily to SpaceX. That strain is projected to only worsen as companies including Rocket Lab, Relativity, Blue Origin and others aim to bring new rockets online in the next few years.

Wallops expansion has likely been on the minds of NASA officials for some time. After Rocket Lab conducted its first Electron launch from there in 2022, agency officials told the media that interest from private companies looking to launch from the site was “high.” And while these plans would eventually be made public as part of the EA process, this is the first time the scale of the proposed changes has been published.

The Wallops Island Southern Expansion Environmental Assessment (WISE EA), as the agency calls the undertaking, will study the potential consequences of a massive increase in annual launches from 18 to 52. The study will also consider other critical changes to the site, like water barge landings of rockets’ first stages and on-site storage of liquid methane, a novel rocket fuel. To fully understand the affects of these changes, NASA will be working with contractors who will conduct acoustic analyses, and look at air emissions impacts and impacts to marine and local wildlife.

The analysis will also consider the construction of up to four new launch pads and the installation of a suborbital launcher conducting up to 30 firings per year.

The increase in launches and new fuel mixes allowed are particularly notable. Today, of the 18 annual launches authorized at WFF, only six can involve liquid-fueled rockets, with the other 12 being solid-propellant rockets. The engines that power Electron, Rocket Lab’s launcher that flies out of Wallops, use a combination of liquid oxygen and RP-1, a highly-refined kerosene.

The new analysis would authorize 52 launches per year and allow a fuel mix that also includes methalox, a rocket fuel composed of liquid oxygen and liquid methane. Methalox has become the propellant system of choice for next-gen rockets including SpaceX’s Starship, Rocket Lab’s Neutron, Relativity Space’s Terran R and Blue Origin’s New Glenn.

A slide showing proposed changes. Image Credits:

One driver of the proposed expansion is the increased launch cadence from these companies. (While Relativity has not publicly disclosed any plans to launch from Wallops, the company, along with Rocket Lab, were listed as the two “participating agencies”.)

The Wallops site has become particularly important to Rocket Lab’s plans to bring Neutron to market by the end of this year. In 2022, the company announced it had selected WFF as the future home for Neutron’s first launch pad and production facility, effectively staking a claim in the future of the island. Rocket Lab’s recovery plans for Neutron also include the booster landing on downrange, on a barge at sea.

One of the slides in Miller’s presentation shows a launch forecast for WFF through 2032. It is unclear whether the data on the slide was provided by private companies or whether it’s from NASA’s internal estimates, and NASA did not immediately respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment, but it charts around five annual Neutron flights per year through 2030. It also charts about five launches of Firefly and Northrop’s MLV by that date.

Image Credits: TechCrunch

Environmental assessments are essential: they ensure NASA and its commercial partners are following environmental regulations related to air emissions, acoustic impacts, and affects on local wildlife. They also provide a critical venue for input from stakeholders, including the public. Having an environmental assessment in place is vital for companies like Rocket Lab, as well as Firefly Space and Northrop Grumman, which are together developing a medium launch vehicle.

NASA completed a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) for the Wallops site in 2019, but as agency official Shari Miller said during the call, the anticipated growth of activity on the island “exceeds the numbers that were analyzed” for that document. Some proposed actions weren’t discussed at all in the 2019 document, like a water barge landing of a rocket. Miller said NASA is simultaneously undertaking what’s known as a “written re-evaluation” of the 2019 assessment to understand if additional environmental assessments is needed to allow for the storage of liquid methane and to authorize static fire tests of methalox engines at WFF. That would authorize those actions for two years, and importantly, act as a sort of temporary measure to facilitate Rocket Lab’s rollout of Neutron. The full WISE EA would extend for a full ten years.

Because of the scope of the various environmental assessments, the full EA process is projected to take around eighteen months, per one slide, with the final document published in December 2025.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Back
WhatsApp
Messenger
Viber