From Digital Age to Nano Age. WorldWide.

Tag: Community

Robotic Automations

Photo-sharing community EyeEm will license users photos to train AI if they don't delete them | TechCrunch


EyeEm, the Berlin-based photo-sharing community that exited last year to Spanish company Freepik, after going bankrupt, is now licensing its users’ photos to train AI models. Earlier this month, the company informed users via email that it was adding a new clause to its Terms & Conditions that would grant it the rights to upload users’ content to “train, develop, and improve software, algorithms, and machine-learning models.” Users were given 30 days to opt out by removing all their content from EyeEm’s platform. Otherwise, they were consenting to this use case for their work.

At the time of its 2023 acquisition, EyeEm’s photo library included 160 million images and nearly 150,000 users. The company said it would merge its community with Freepik’s over time.

Once thought of as a possible challenger to Instagram — or at least “Europe’s Instagram” — EyeEm had dwindled to a staff of three before selling to Freepik, TechCrunch’s Ingrid Lunden previously reported. Joaquin Cuenca Abela, CEO of Freepik, hinted at the company’s possible plans for EyeEm, saying it would explore how to bring more AI into the equation for creators on the platform.

As it turns out, that meant selling their work to train AI models.

Now, EyeEm’s updated Terms & Conditions reads as follows:

8.1 Grant of Rights – EyeEm Community

By uploading Content to EyeEm Community, you grant us regarding your Content the non-exclusive, worldwide, transferable and sublicensable right to reproduce, distribute, publicly display, transform, adapt, make derivative works of, communicate to the public and/or promote such Content.

This specifically includes the sublicensable and transferable right to use your Content for the training, development and improvement of software, algorithms and machine learning models. In case you do not agree to this, you should not add your Content to EyeEm Community.

The rights granted in this section 8.1 regarding your Content remains valid until complete deletion from EyeEm Community and partner platforms according to section 13. You can request the deletion of your Content at any time. The conditions for this can be found in section 13.

Section 13 details a complicated process for deletions that begins with first deleting photos directly — which would not impact content that had been previously shared to EyeEm Magazine or social media, the company notes. To delete content from the EyeEm Market (where photographers sold their photos) or other content platforms, users would have to submit a request to [email protected] and provide the Content ID numbers for those photos they wanted to delete and whether it should be removed from their account, as well, or the EyeEm market only.

Of note, the notice says that these deletions from EyeEm market and partner platforms could take up to 180 days. Yes, that’s right: requested deletions take up to 180 days but users only have 30 days to opt out. That means the only option is manually deleting photos one by one.

Worse still, the company adds that:

You hereby acknowledge and agree that your authorization for EyeEm to market and license your Content according to sections 8 and 10 will remain valid until the Content is deleted from EyeEm and all partner platforms within the time frame indicated above. All license agreements entered into before complete deletion and the rights of use granted thereby remain unaffected by the request for deletion or the deletion.

Section 8 is where licensing rights to train AI are detailed. In Section 10, EyeEm informs users they will forgo their right to any payouts for their work if they delete their account — something users may think to do to avoid having their data fed to AI models. Gotcha!

EyeEm’s move is an example of how AI models are being trained on the back of users’ content, sometimes without their explicit consent. Though EyeEm did offer an opt-out procedure of sorts, any photographer who missed the announcement would have lost the right to dictate how their photos were to be used going forward. Given that EyeEm’s status as a popular Instagram alternative had significantly declined over the years, many photographers may have forgotten they had ever used it in the first place. They certainly may have ignored the email, if it wasn’t already in a spam folder somewhere.

Those who did notice the changes were upset they were only given a 30-day notice and no options to bulk delete their contributions, making it more painful to opt out.

Requests for comment sent to EyeEm weren’t immediately confirmed, but given this countdown had a 30-day deadline, we’ve opted to publish before hearing back.

This sort of dishonest behavior is why users today are considering a move to the open social web. The federated platform, Pixelfed, which runs on the same ActivityPub protocol that powers Mastodon, is capitalizing on the EyeEm situation to attract users.

In a post on its official account, Pixelfed announced “We will never use your images to help train AI models. Privacy First, Pixels Forever.”




Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Campus, a community college startup, receives $23M Series A extension led by Founders Fund | TechCrunch


Although many students in the United States enter community colleges intending to transfer to four-year universities, only 16% of those students receive bachelor’s degrees within six years. But Campus, an online alternative to traditional community colleges, has an approach that aims to change that. 

Many adjunct professors at the nation’s top universities, including UCLA, Princeton and NYU, earn such low salaries that a quarter of them qualify for some form of government assistance. At the same time, the cost of education has been skyrocketing.

“I got obsessed with the idea of giving everybody access to these amazing professors” at a price that most students can afford, said Campus founder Tade Oyerinde.

Investors seem to be obsessed, too: The company announced Tuesday that it raised a $23 million Series A extension round, led by Founders Fund, with 8VC participating. 

Campus has hired adjunct professors who are also currently teaching at colleges like Vanderbilt, Princeton and NYU, paying them $8,000 a course, which is much higher than the national average. The cost of attending Campus is $7,200 a year; it’s fully covered for students who qualify for federal Pell Grants, allowing about 40% of the college’s students to study for free.

All students are provided with a laptop, Wi-Fi and access to tutors. They’re paired with coaches who are tasked with making sure that everyone stays on track. Enrollment has been growing fast, according to Oyerinde. Students want to be a part of something modern and new, he said, and they think of Campus as a trampoline into a four-year program.

Last year, Campus raised a $29 million Series A, led by Sam Altman and Discord founder Jason Citron. Solo VC Lachy Groom, Bloomberg Beta, Founders Fund, Reach Capital and Precursor Venture also participated. Earlier this year, the company caught Shaquille O’Neal’s eye, and the basketball star topped up that round.

Most of the capital from Campus’s first Series A installment went toward purchasing a physical college in Sacramento. While most students study online and are based throughout the country, the community college now offers in-person courses in phlebotomy, medical assistance and cosmetology.

Tech-like margins

The capital from Founders Fund-led Series A extension, which Campus is announcing on Tuesday, will be used to fuel growth. 

The firm boosted its stake in Campus — Founders Fund’s first edtech bet — due to the company’s scalable tech platform, said partner Trae Stephens.

“I think the structure is kind of a hack,” he said. “You can get the cost low enough that there are no out-of-pocket costs. That’s very hard to do when there are overhead costs attached.” 

Perhaps this is why VCs have historically avoided backing traditional academic institutions. 

For now, each class has on average 75 students and three teacher assistants. While Oyerinde didn’t say whether professor to student ratios will increase as enrollment numbers grow, he emphasized that Campus’ margins look like those of a tech business.

The company is very mindful of for-profit colleges’ dark past. In 2019, University of Phoenix, a private university, agreed to pay a $50 million fine and forgive $140 million in student fees, following a five-year investigation by the Federal Trade Commission into the company’s misleading claims about job opportunities available to its students.

“Campus is not going to saddle students with tons of debt. I don’t think this is good for the U.S. economy,” Stephens said. “We’re going to do this in a way that aligns with the goals of the Federal Pell grants.”

Oyerinde says the company is squarely focused on making sure that the cost of education is low (or nothing) and that students graduate.

Campus faces a surprising challenge: finding the coaches. While attracting professors (with a long waitlist) and students is simple, the company needs coaches who encourage students to stick with their education.

“If we need engineers or marketing people. That’s easy,” Oyerinde said. “But there’s not a pool of people who’ve done this particular role of building deep relationships, motivating people consistently for multiple years on end.”


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Cherub, an angel investing community inspired by dating apps, entices investors and founders to pair up | TechCrunch


Jaclyn Johnson and Angeline Vuong were on a hike deliberating how hard it can be for people to get started in angel investing when they realized they had stumbled upon a startup idea. 

Today they are the co-founders of Cherub, a marketplace that pairs angel investors with entrepreneurs.

Vuong spent nearly five years working in product and growth at Opendoor. Johnson founded Create & Cultivate, a self-described “media company for ambitious women” and had experienced both sides of the investing world — as a founder and an investor. Before starting Create & Cultivate, Johnson sold her own startup (No Subject) in 2016 and invested in numerous companies, including luggage company Away. 

Johnson likens Los Angeles-based Cherub to Raya, an online membership-based community for dating, in that it matches founders and angel investors based on their preferences.

“You can go to this platform as an entrepreneur and you can go on the platform as an angel investor and get access to both people and express interest based on tags,” she said in an interview with TechCrunch. “So for instance, if I go on the app and I’m interested in women-owned businesses in the CPG space doing their Series A or something specific, I’ll get surface deal flow that is the highest match to what I’m looking for.”

With Cherub, investors and entrepreneurs can see who is interested in them on the back end. If they too are interested, they can indicate it as such and it’s a match. Conversely, if an investor approaches a founder but that founder doesn’t view them as a potential fit, they can reject the invitation to connect. Or if an entrepreneur’s minimum investment is $25,000 but an angel investor is only investing $10,000 per deal, they can see that and not reach out to connect.

“We’re sort of using dating app mechanics in a way,” Johnson said. “So we jokingly call it the Raya for deal flow.”

Membership-based

To test the concept for Cherub, Johnson and Voung last year first started a weekly newsletter that got 1,500 sign-ups within three weeks on word of mouth alone.

Encouraged, the pair built out an alpha product last summer that featured about 40 companies and gave investors a way to request a deck. All 40 got requests for deck views, Johnson said. Half of those deck views resulted in an introduction, she said, where investors expressed that they were interested in being pitched by the founder. Twenty percent of those introductions ended up getting funded in less than three months, collectively raising $1.1 million in capital.

Of those deals, 40% were new angel investors, meaning they were accredited investors that had never written checks before.

Cherub is now in the process of a slow launch, with 100 startups on the platform generating revenue of $50,000. They plan to grow that to 500, and have a waitlist of 1,500 startups, Johnson said.

Image Credits: Co-founders Jaclyn Johnson and Angeline Vuong / Cherub

Cherub is free for investors to use and charges startups via a membership model. A $480/year membership lets founders list their companies in the directory and includes analytics such as how many people viewed their deck. The Cherub Select membership costs $950 a year and involves a more vetted process to show the company more actively to investors, Johnson said.

Johnson said that Cherub also helps founders find incubators and accelerators and has partnerships with the associated incubators of firms such as Andreessen Horowitz, Dream Ventures and New York Fashion Tech Lab.

Investors also get access to data such as “updates on how a company is performing, whether they’re raising or not and how much,” Johnson said. 

Of course Cherub is not the only platform teaming up angels with entrepreneurs. AngelList is the biggest and best known. Israeli crowdsourcing firm OurCrowd is also huge, and then there are the ones offered by venture firms, like Hustle Squad’s Angel Squad for accredited investors, or others like Jason Calacanis’ The Syndicate.

But Cherub is different in a number of ways, Johnson says. For one, it features startups with an emphasis on consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies. Though it also includes AI companies, hotel projects and apps, among others.

AngelList is more of a B2B platform, is very tech industry centric and is best for those who already have knowledge or experience in startup investing and can afford to invest fairly sizable amounts, in Johnson’s view.

Then there’s crowdsourcing Wefunder or Republic, which will allow investors to invest tiny amounts, sometimes as little as $100, which Johnson describes as “the kickstarter of angel investing.” 

Cherub sits in the middle, she says. For instance, like traditional VC firms, the company hosts “founder-funder mixers.” Last year, for example, Cherub teamed up with Sophia Amoruso’s Trust Fund to host a cocktail party at which “every single thing on site was investable,” such as the drinks being served and featuring a pop-up shop where guests could “shop any products that they want to test drive.”

“From that event alone, over $400,000 in deals were generated,” Johnson said.

Angel investor Allen Orr told TechCrunch that he had used other platforms such as AngelList in the past.

“However, I felt that it was not a very personal experience and felt too transactional,” he told TechCrunch via email. “What appealed to me about Cherub was the idea of a tailored and social approach to investing,” he said, adding “I also liked that there are opportunities not just for investment but also advising brands.” 

Maggie Rose Macar, founder and CEO of mental health support app Zant, said an investor wrote a $25,000 check into her company after it was featured in one of the earliest versions of Cherub’s newsletters and after she met the investor in person at one of Cherub’s events.

“I think Cherub does a great job at bringing active investors into the room with founders who are looking,” she told TechCrunch.

Cherub has raised $1.25 million of its own, naturally from angels, including Drybar’s Alli Webb and Blavity’s Morgan DeBaun, among others.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

X rolls out support for posting Community Notes in India ahead of elections | TechCrunch


Weeks before the national elections in India, Elon Musk-owned X said it is rolling out support for posting Community Notes — the company’s crowd-sourced fact-checking program — in the key overseas market.

The first set of contributors from India will start posting notes from today and more will be accepted over time, X said. The contributors typically provide more context to popular posts to debunk any myth or offer broader insights. These submissions are then rated by users on factors such as the helpfulness they provide or the accuracy.

In December 2022, the social network enabled the ability for people to look at Community Notes related to posts globally, but users from only a few countries could post such notes.

Over time, the company has allowed members from different countries to start posting Community Notes to provide local context better. With the latest rollout, the program has contributors in 69 countries.

Last year, the company also introduced Community Notes, previously called Birdwatch, for images and videos.

India was one of the last major markets where Community Notes had not previously expanded. With national elections just a few weeks away, many platforms are making efforts to combat potential election-related misinformation. However, X hasn’t made any specific announcement about its efforts for Indian elections.

Though Community Notes is proving helpful in fact-checking posts on X, it has at times struggled to control the spread of misinformation despite contributors adding context to stories. The program may also face a tough test in India’s complex multilingual political landscape.

Last year, the company reallowed political ads on the platform, which were banned by the previous management.

Twitter/X has had a tough stay in the Indian market notably for its legal battle against the government for ordering the platform to block certain posts. Earlier this year, X withheld some accounts and posts related to farmers’ protests in India because of orders from authorities. At that time, the company reiterated that a writ appeal challenging blocking orders was still pending in the courts.

Last year, Musk said in a conversation with BBC that India’s social media rules are quite strict and the company “can’t go beyond the laws of the country.”




Software Development in Sri Lanka

Back
WhatsApp
Messenger
Viber