From Digital Age to Nano Age. WorldWide.

Tag: China

Robotic Automations

Apple: pay attention to emerging markets, not falling China sales | TechCrunch


Apple’s chief financial officer Luca Maestri challenged investor worries over an 8% drop in China revenue, by noting that sales in other emerging markets are growing.

“When we start looking at places like India, like Saudi, like Mexico, Turkey, Brazil…and Indonesia, the numbers are getting large, and we’re very happy because these are markets where our market share is [currenttly] low,” Maestri said Thursday during Apple’s second-quarter earnings call.

Revenue declined to $16.37 billion in China during the second quarter

“The populations are large and growing, and our products are really making a lot of progress within those markets,” continued Maestri. “The level of excitement for the brand is very high.”

One thing Maestri said there is verifiable: the populations in emerging markets are, in fact, large and growing. But Apple’s growth in those regions isn’t as rosy a picture as the executive attempted to paint, according to available data.

Net sales in the Americas — which would include places like Brazil and Mexico — were down slightly year-over-year from $37.8 billion to $37.3 billion, according to Apple’s Q2 2024 report. Sales in the “rest of Asia Pacific,” which would include emerging markets like India and Vietnam, were down 17% from $8.1 billion in the second-quarter of 2023 to $6.7 billion as of March 31.

To play devil’s advocate, Apple’s falling sales in those regions may have more to do with pricing than hype for the product.

Maestri noted that Apple has introduced several financing solutions and trade-in programs that “reduce the affordability threshold,” so that customers can buy in the top product range.

“That is very valuable for us in developed markets, but particularly in emerging markets where the affordability issues are more pronounced,” said Maestri.

Still, pointing to the beacon of hope that could be emerging markets may not be enough to settle down investors. China is Apple’s third-largest market, and it’s become a battleground of steep competition with domestic companies like Oppo and Xiaomi dominating the market. According to Counterpoint Research, Huwaei has has seen a massive swing in the country after being completely sidelined by U.S. sanctions. The firm’s phone sales increased almost 70% from the previous year, while Apple’s fell 19%. In September 2023, Beijing imposed bans on the iPhone for government officials in the workplace, echoing U.S. action against Huawei.

China and emerging markets aren’t the only downers on Apple’s balance sheet this quarter. The company also reported a 10% drop in iPhone sales across all markets. Apple’s slow adoption of AI versus competitors like Google and Microsoft have also potentially played a role in slowed down iPhone sales.

Despite unimpressive hardware figures, Apple still managed to beat Wall Street expectations. It also summoned a stock hike of more than 10% in after-hours trading, fueled by both an increase on services revenue and a massive $110 billion stock buyback — a jump over last year’s $90 billion purchase.

Investors on the call tried to get Maestri and Apple CEO Tim Cook to divulge some more details about its upcoming generative AI launches, which Apple has teased over the last few months, but the executives would only reveal that announcements were imminent.

We’ll be keeping our eyes out for Apple’s Worldwide Developer Conference for more news.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Apple pulls WhatsApp, Threads from China App Store following state order | TechCrunch


Apple has removed the Meta-owned end-to-end encrypted messaging app WhatsApp from its App Store in China following a government order citing national security concerns, the news agency Reuters reported Friday.

Meta’s newer, Twitter-esque text-based social networking app, Threads, has also been pulled from the App Store for the same reason, it said.

“The Cyberspace Administration of China ordered the removal of these apps from the China storefront based on their national security concerns,” Apple said in a statement sent to the news agency.

Meta confirmed to TechCrunch that its two apps are no longer available on Apple’s App Store in China but declined to provide any more details about the takedowns. “We refer you to Apple for comment,” a Meta spokesperson told us.

We also contacted Apple with questions about the removals but at press time the iPhone maker had not responded.

According to Reuters, two other messaging apps have also been removed from Apple’s App Store in China — namely Signal and Telegram. It cites data from app tracking firms Qimai and AppMagic for this element of its report.

Apple has not confirmed these two additional removals. But the AppleCensorship site, which tracks App Store removals, records both Signal and Telegram as “disappeared” from Apple’s mainland China App Store.

We reached out to Telegram regarding the status of its iOS App but at press time it had not responded.

Asked about Reuters’ report, Signal’s president Meredith Whittaker told TechCrunch that Signal was already blocked in China by the country’s Great Firewall.

“While Signal may have been available to download in the past, Signal registrations and messages are apparently blocked,” she said, suggesting it makes little difference if its app no longer appears on the App Store since users accessing the app from China would be unable to register or send messages.

Signal does not always seem to have been blocked in this way, though. Back in 2021, TechCrunch’s Rita Liao reported that Signal worked perfectly in China, including without using a VPN. But, presumably, state censors have clamped down further on the end-to-end encrypted messaging app since then.

Earlier removals

It’s not the first time Apple has removed apps at the direction of China’s internet regulator. Last summer multiple generative AI apps were taken off Apple’s China App Store shortly before Chinese regulations targeted at generative AI were due to take effect.

Last year another Twitter alternative, Jack Dorsey-backed Damus, was also pulled from Apple’s China App Store shortly after it had been approved.

A few years ago the audio social networking app Clubhouse was also pulled from Apple’s store in China shortly after its global release. In recent years Apple has also removed popular censorship circumvention tools (and previously VPN apps); RSS apps; podcast apps; and even a Quran app, to name a few other examples.

Why WhatsApp and Threads have been targeted for removal from Apple’s Chinese App Store now isn’t clear.

One is an end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) messaging app, the other is a microblogging-style social media app. (Telegram has both private messaging and one-to-many broadcast style features, with (non-default) proprietary E2EE only available for so-called “secret chats”; Signal offers industry gold-standard E2EE across all aspects of its app.)

Threads launched in early July last year. The app itself has been blocked by China’s Great Firewall, meaning users in China wanting to download it have to use a VPN to circumvent the censorship. Quite a number evidently managed to do so, as Threads quickly landed in the top 5 on Apple’s China App Store last summer.

A popular app would be more likely to catch more attention from China’s state censors, potentially encouraging them to take additional action to clamp down on usage — such as ordering Apple to remove the software from its store.

At the same time, other popular, Meta-owned apps, Facebook and Instagram, are still available on Apple’s China App Store, per AppleCensorship. But as TC’s Liao pointed out, in a 2021 post about rising usage of Signal and Telegram, “China’s censorship decisions can be arbitrary and inconsistent.”


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

China tensions underline US investment in TSMC | TechCrunch


The United States Department of Commerce Monday proposed investing as much as $6.6 billion to fund a third Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) fab in Arizona. The funding would arrive by way of the CHIPS and Science Act, in a bid to foster more domestic semiconductor production.

The move represents a broader push to bring more manufacturing to the U.S., but unspoken in the fanfare around today’s announcement is the potential escalation of tensions with China.

The proposed fab is a greenfield facility — meaning it’s custom-built from the ground up. It would focus on 2nm (“or newer”) architectures, designed for a slew of different applications, including computing, 5G/6G wireless communications and, of course, AI. TSMC Arizona — the subsidiary behind the proposed construction — has stated that it will build the facility before the end of the decade.

The chipmaker says construction will bring more than 20,000 jobs to the area, while forecasting around 6,000 manufacturing roles once the facility is operational.

Localized manufacturing has been a key focus for the Biden administration, as the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted vulnerabilities in the global supply chain. Those issues have been exacerbated by the ubiquity of silicon in our daily lives. Those numbers are only growing. According to a semiconductor trade association, global sales hit $47.6 billion in January 2024 — marking more than a 15% increase over the prior year.

“TSMC’s renewed commitment to the United States, and its investment in Arizona represent a broader story for semiconductor manufacturing that’s made in America and with the strong support of America’s leading technology firms to build the products we rely on every day,” President Biden said in a release tied to the news.

Much of the administration’s funding has focused on U.S. firms like Intel, which was targeted with its own $8.5 billion proposal toward the end of March. TSMC, however, is an 800-pound gorilla, both in terms of market share and technological advances. The firm has, however, found itself in the middle of looming geopolitical concerns. The United States and allies would be at a massive disadvantage should China seize control of Taiwan and its manufacturing capabilities.

TSMC has its own concerns over such a scenario. For one thing, the company’s two biggest customers — Apple and Nvidia — are American. For another, some in the U.S. have even gone so far as suggesting the country bomb chipmakers, should such things come to pass.

“We should make it very clear to the Chinese, if you invade Taiwan, we will blow up TSMC,” Massachusetts Congressman Seth Moulton said at an event back in May.

The Democratic representative has since distanced himself from the clip, stating that it was selectively edited by the Chinese Communist Party. However, he is hardly alone in floating such suggestions. Earlier the same year, former Trump National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien stated, “The United States and its allies are never going to let those factories fall into Chinese hands,” suggesting the country destroy the factories. O’Brien went so far as comparing such hypothetical actions to Britain’s actions during the Second World War.

Such saber rattling has drawn international criticism. Beyond the clear ethical questions, such an evasive action would have a massive impact on the global economy. In addition to Apple and Nvidia, TSMC also serves Sony, MediaTek, AMD, Qualcomm and Broadcom, among others.

For all the money the United States government continues to invest, Intel is simply playing catch-up to TSMC’s multiyear technological head start. TSMC makes around 90% of the world’s most advanced chips. For now, the best defense the U.S. has against future disruptions — be they pandemics or geopolitical conflicts — is diversification of supply. That applies to where and by whom components are manufactured.

While the architects of the CHIPS and Science Act would no doubt love to elevate U.S. companies manufacturing domestically, ours is a global economy. TSMC is certainly aware of the value of distributing the supply chain.

“The proposed funding from the CHIPS and Science Act would provide TSMC the opportunity to make this unprecedented investment and to offer our foundry service of the most advanced manufacturing technologies in the United States,” the chip giant’s chairman Mark Liu said in a release tied to the news. “Our U.S. operations allow us to better support our U.S. customers, which include several of the world’s leading technology companies. Our U.S. operations will also expand our capability to trailblaze future advancements in semiconductor technology.”

Among those who monitor U.S.-China relations, the upcoming presidential election could mark a key turning point. Former President Trump dramatically escalated trade tensions, for one. Huawei’s addition to the entity list marked a massive setback for the mobile firm, as it lost access to key components from American companies like Google and Qualcomm.

Speaking last year, Biden’s now-former U.S. Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines noted that if a U.S. invasion halts TSMC’s Taiwan-based product, “it will have an enormous global financial impact that I think runs somewhere between $600 billion to $1 trillion on an annual basis for the first few years.”


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Microsoft's $1.5B check for G42 shows growing US-China rift | TechCrunch


As the Gulf region gains growing strategic importance for the tech war between the U.S. and China, Microsoft makes a big move into one of its richest oil countries.

On Monday evening, Microsoft announced a $1.5 billion strategic investment in G42, the Abu Dhabi-based company that has become a major force in the United Arab Emirates’ ambition to be a global leader in artificial intelligence. The minority stake will give Brad Smith, Microsoft’s vice chair and president, a seat on G42’s board of directors.

The deal signifies much more than a mere commercial collaboration between two AI titans. It serves as evidence of the two countries’ strategic positioning amid rising geopolitical tensions.

The funding comes amid U.S. politicians’ escalating concerns over G42’s ties with China. In January, the bipartisan-select House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party sent a letter to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo calling for the inclusion of G42 on the Entity List, which would bar the Emirati company from accessing sensitive U.S. technologies.

Such a move would put G42 under the same security concerns umbrella as Huawei, which was placed on the Entity List in 2019 and has since been restricted from acquiring critical U.S. technologies, including high-end chips and certain Android services.

Now, the Microsoft deal is a judgment on which superpower G42 has aligned itself with.

Delicate dance

As the UAE navigates a delicate balance between the U.S. and China, its AI poster child G42 has inevitably become a proxy in the tech rivalry between the two superpowers. Though a long-time economic and military ally of the U.S., the UAE has in recent times diverged from Washington’s foreign policy and expanded its partnerships with China, a development that worries Washington.

Last year, the UAE’s president Mohamed bin Zayed attended Russia’s flagship economic forum, which was largely shunned by Western countries in protest of the Ukraine war. The UAE has also increased military cooperation with China, including a plan for their first joint air force training last year.

On the business side, the UAE is attracting Chinese venture capitalists and entrepreneurs who are increasingly excluded from the U.S. market. General managers of Chinese funds have turned to the UAE and its affluent Middle Eastern neighbors for capital as American limited partners retreat from China. Riding on the UAE’s commitment to electrify its economy, China’s electric vehicle manufacturers have been aggressively peddling plug-in models in the market. Last year, premium EV maker Nio secured a handsome $738.5 million investment from an Abu Dhabi-backed fund.

Given the two countries’ increasing economic ties, it’s no surprise that G42, the AI poster child of the UAE, has also forged ties with Chinese firms. What appears to be commercial relationships, however, have greatly concerned U.S. politicians.

In its letter to Raimondo, the House Select Committee on the CCP noted that G42 maintains relationships with companies like Huawei, biotech giant Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) and Tencent.

The Committee also highlighted the background of G42’s CEO Peng Xiao, who previously held a senior position at a subsidiary of DarkMatter, a company that develops “spyware and surveillance tools that can be used to spy on dissidents, journalists, politicians, and U.S. companies.”

Given these alleged Chinese ties, the Committee is concerned that G42 can be a way for Chinese firms to access U.S. technologies that are otherwise under export control. G42 and its affiliates maintain “extensive commercial relationships” with companies including Microsoft, Dell, and OpenAI.

Picking side

The deal between the two private tech giants represents an uncommon case involving overt backing from their respective governments. According to the announcement, this “commercial partnership is backed by assurances to the U.S. and UAE governments through a first-of-its-kind binding agreement to apply world-class best practices to ensure the secure, trusted, and responsible development and deployment of AI.”

If the deal goes through, it will designate Microsoft as G42’s official cloud partner. Under the agreement, the Emirati company’s data platform and other key technology infrastructure will migrate to Microsoft Azure, which will power G42’s AI product development. G42 already has a partnership with OpenAI that commenced in 2023.

The partnership with Microsoft appears to be a continuation of G42’s ongoing effort to pare back its Chinese influence. The firm has divested from its China-related investments, including TikTok parent ByteDance, and Xiao said late last year that the firm had plans to phase out Chinese hardware because “We cannot work with both sides.”

What Microsoft gains in return is extensive market access to the region, where its AI business and Azure will be implemented across a range of industries like financial services, healthcare, energy, government and education. The partnership will also see the pair launching a $1 billion fund “for developers to boost AI skills” in the UAE and the broader region.

As tech companies have learned in the past few years, it’s become increasingly difficult to avoid picking a side — whether in terms of technology solutions, markets or capital — between the U.S. and China. The developments around G42 demonstrate that even a country like the UAE, which has sought to be a neutral ground between the two rival nations, will ultimately be forced to take a side.




Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

TikTok ban could harm Amazon sellers looking for alternatives | TechCrunch


In March, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a bill that could force ByteDance to divest TikTok or face a ban in U.S. app stores. Much of the related discussion and debate has centered around American data security and speech rights, but a potential move also highlights something else: TikTok is growing its focus on e-commerce, but the interplay of tech giants and geopolitics is squeezing smaller merchants.

Over the past few months, merchants — many of them from China — looking for an Amazon alternative have flocked to TikTok to peddle clothes, cosmetics, electronics and a variety of other products to U.S. buyers, by way of TikTok Shop. In interviews with TechCrunch, sellers from Shenzhen — the Chinese megacity that’s a major hub for Amazon merchants —  said they felt a collective sense of frustration over rising geopolitical tensions and “helplessness” about a potential TikTok ban.

“The situation is not within our control,” a retailer specializing in maternity and baby products told TechCrunch. “It’s just difficult to know how things will develop.” With existing supply chains hard to shift, “we just have to play it by ear.” (The sellers asked not to be named due to political sensitivities.)

TikTok Shop officially launched in September 2023 with 200,000 merchants already on board. But since then it has not provided any updated numbers on how many merchants are currently on the platform, nor how much they sell there, nor how many sell elsewhere (and where else that might be).

Research from Jungle Scout, an Amazon data intelligence provider, gives some idea of TikTok’s e-commerce impact, however. It found that 20% of Amazon sellers, brands, and businesses have plans to expand to TikTok Shop this year. Before the current political backlash took off, ByteDance reportedly projected that it had the potential to grow its U.S. e-commerce business tenfold to $17.5 billion this year.

TikTok isn’t the only platform on the list for merchants looking for more channels beyond Amazon to expand their customer bases. Its rise is part of a bigger shift we’ve been seeing around alternative marketplaces like Temu commanding more attention not just from shoppers, but also from Chinese e-commerce exporters and merchants. And Amazon is reportedly taking notice, another sign that alternatives are picking up traction.

TikTok did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

A new way to sell and buy

TikTok has been trying to boost its e-commerce business since the U.S. launch last September.

The app is famous — or infamous, depending on who you talk to — for how it tightly controls what content is surfaced for whom. TikTok Shop also has a strong dose of curation to it.

Unlike Temu, known for its seas of cheap, white-labeled products from Chinese factories sold directly to U.S. consumers, TikTok’s strategy has been to onboard and highlight more branded goods, making it more of a direct competitor to Amazon.

TikTok is also looking to attract sellers with more traditional subsidies. According to reports, to encourage merchants to sell goods at a steep discount during the most recent Black Friday sales period, TikTok doled out subsidies to those merchants to mark down their prices by as much as 50%.

Incentives and algorithms aside, merchants have been interested in selling on the app simply because TikTok’s short video platform generates massive engagement. According to a survey from Tabcut, a Chinese firm that tracks TikTok Shop performance, nearly 70% of sellers reported an increase in sales year-over-year for the first 11 months of 2023.

This is also borne out by consumer behavior, where products endorsed by influencers continue to gain ground, especially with coveted younger consumers.

According to Jungle Scout, nearly 20% of consumers began their search for products on TikTok in the first quarter of 2023, up 44% from a year ago. While 56% of all consumers still preferred to start their product search on Amazon, 40% of the Gen Z demographic preferred TikTok for search instead of Google.

The heavy concentration of young shoppers is unsurprising, given 52% of TikTok’s U.S. users are aged 18 to 34, according to Pew Research. TikTok has the opportunity to reshape how America’s younger generations shop online.

Outside of leaning on its dynamics, TikTok has been doing some pretty bald media spinning to push its message.

Earlier this month, the commercial research firm Oxford Economics published a report on the impact of TikTok on the small to medium-sized business (SMB) sector in the U.S. It was funded by TikTok, and perhaps unsurprisingly, it provided a ringing endorsement of TikTok’s economic impact: It estimated that a presence on the platform (through advertising or just marketing themselves via accounts) led to $14.7 billion in revenue for the 7 million SMBs in the U.S. using it.

Amazon challenger?

TikTok seems to be serious about making inroads into e-commerce, but it’s still in flux. On one hand, the company — even as it faces a potential U.S. ban or forced sale — continues to roll out new e-commerce features, such as a new video shopping format it previewed at a conference this month. On the other, it’s modifying or enforcing seller policies seemingly on the fly as it tries to navigate how to grow under a particularly glaring spotlight.

“TikTok [Shop]’s internal management is a bit chaotic right now. It’s a new platform, so it hasn’t started squeezing sellers, but its policies are still changing,” said a merchant selling lamps, who has been selling on Amazon since the mid-2010s.

One of those policies appears to be related to what its algorithms are surfacing to which consumers. Merchants out of China say that in recent months, TikTok Shop in the U.S. has ramped up efforts to prioritize U.S.-based shops over foreign ones. Sellers tell TechCrunch that it’s led to the rise of black market “agents” — parties that broker deals between foreign sellers and American residents, who in turn set up TikTok Shops that appear U.S.-owned but are really run by the foreign merchants.

Merchants are willing to jump through these hoops to grow their touch points with users, and diversifying their channels as one giant emerges after another.

“Margins on Amazon are getting thinner and competition is increasingly fierce because of Temu, so TikTok gives us another option,” said the lamp seller.

To gauge TikTok’s impact on Amazon, “we need to understand the overall retail market in the U.S.,” said Richard Xu, partner at Starting Gate Fund, who invests in cross-border retail solutions between China and the U.S.

E-commerce comprises around 15% of U.S. retail, according to the Department of Commerce, so “if we talk about the small share of the online e-commerce sector alone, there isn’t much to discuss,” suggested Xu.

But if TikTok Shop’s strategy is mainly focused on bringing offline businesses online for the first time, that could be a very big move. “[Using] live streaming e-commerce to allow offline small shops and stores to participate, the potential is quite significant.”

In any case, while 15% sounds small, the number is still substantial — $285.2 billion — so TikTok Shop’s potential is enormous even if it just gets a small slice of the existing e-commerce cake.

Juozas Kaziukenas, founder of e-commerce intelligence firm Marketplace Pulse, doubts TikTok will ever replace Amazon. “It doesn’t have the broad selection and fulfillment, and shoppers in the West are used to search-based e-commerce,” he said. “But many people spend many hours using TikTok every day, thus, sometimes they will buy things on it.”

“In the U.S. and other countries in the West, shopping apps developed in parallel with apps that provide entertainment or connection like social media. We got used to getting different things from different apps, as opposed to going to one place for it all,” he added.

“Today, social apps like TikTok are trying to figure out shopping before retailers like Amazon figure out social (like through Amazon Inspire). But the status quo of different apps serving different needs remains.”


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

GGV Capital is no more, as partners announce two separate brands | TechCrunch


The VCs who long ran GGV Capital, the 24-year-old cross-border firm that helped serve as a bridge between the U.S. and China, have settled on two new brands roughly six months after announcing they would split their U.S. and Asia operations.

Veteran investors Jenny Lee and Jixun Foo just rebranded their Singapore-based operation as Granite Asia, as first reported in Forbes. Meanwhile, Hans Tung, a firm co-founder who lives in the Bay Area, announced on X on Saturday that the U.S. team is now called Notable Capital.

GGV Capital announced last fall that it was splitting up its team amid growing tensions between the U.S. and China, though it never cited the atmosphere as the explicit driver of the move.

Sequoia Capital similarly split up its operations last year as it navigated geopolitical tensions. In Sequoia’s case, the U.S. team held onto the storied brand, while Sequoia India & Southeast Asia was rebranded as Peak XV Partners, and Sequoia China was rebranded as HongShan, the Mandarin word for redwood.

The thinking in abandoning the GGV Capital brand, per a source familiar, was that because both teams are operating separately going forward, they felt it was best to develop new brands.

Granite Asia is being led by Lee and Foo, native Singaporeans. Lee is a regular fixture on Forbes’s Midas List of top-performing VCs, with nine IPOs in the last five years, including the smartphone giant Xiaomi and the software development company Kingsoft WPS, which went public in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Foo, whose title was formerly global managing director of GGV Capital, is meanwhile credited with deals that include the electric carmaker Xpeng Motors, which went public in 2020; ride-hail giant Didi, which is reportedly planning a listing in Hong Kong this year; and the delivery company Grab, whose shares have underperformed since it became publicly traded through a special purpose acquisition vehicle in late 2021. (It was reportedly in talks as recently as last month to merge with another beleaguered rival, GoTo Group.)

Granite Asia will focus on startups in China, Japan, South Asia, Australia and Southeast Asia.

Notable Capital — which says it plans to continue investing in the U.S., as well as in Europe and Latin America — is being led by the same investors who’ve been based in its Menlo Park office for many years. That includes Tung, who is Taiwanese-American and whose deals include known brands like Airbnb, StockX and Slack; Jeff Richards, who has backed Coinbase, the Bluetooth-tracking outfit Tile and the software development company Handshake; and Glenn Solomon, whose deals include HashiCorp, whose software helps companies operate in the cloud (it’s reportedly weighing a sale right now); the publicly traded house-buying platform Opendoor; and the compliance automation startup Drata.

Oren Yunger, the newest member of GGV Capital, also remains on team Notable. Yunger had joined GGV as an investor in 2018 and was promoted to managing director last fall.

Another longtime managing director at GGV Capital, Eric Xu, who is based in Shanghai, will continue to oversee the original firm’s independently operated yuan-denominated funds.

Roughly two-and-a-half years ago, GGV Capital announced it had raised $2.5 billion for its new funds, marking its largest family of funds ever. The investors have since split those assets under management, along with the capital raised prior, such that Granite Asia is now managing a collective $5 billion altogether, leaving Notable Capital with roughly $4.2 billion based on GGV Capital’s assets under management at the time the split was announced.

Pictured above, left to right: Jeff Richards, Eric Xu, Glenn Solomon, Jenny Lee, Jixun Foo and Hans Tung 




Software Development in Sri Lanka

Back
WhatsApp
Messenger
Viber