From Digital Age to Nano Age. WorldWide.

Tag: cap

Robotic Automations

Learn how to master cap table management with Fidelity Private Shares | TechCrunch


Are you gearing up to secure funding for your startup or maybe you’ve raised a little bit already? If so, ensuring your cap table and data room are pristine could be the difference between a smooth, swift raise and a drawn-out, costly process. At TechCrunch Early Stage 2024, join Fidelity Private Shares’ session, “Preparing to Raise: Cap Table Best Practices to Help You Close Fast” to gain invaluable insights from industry experts. This session promises to equip founders with the essential knowledge needed to navigate the fundraising landscape efficiently.

Attendees of this session will walk away with actionable guidance from three experts representing the legal, investor, and founder perspectives. Whether you’re a first-time founder or a seasoned entrepreneur, mastering cap table management is essential for a successful fundraising journey. Don’t miss this opportunity to learn from the best and streamline your path to funding success at TechCrunch Early Stage 2024.

Meet the speakers

Kristen Craft, vice president and business partner manager at Fidelity Private Shares, brings a wealth of experience from both sides of the startup equation. With her background as a founder and startup operator, Kristen understands the challenges firsthand. At Fidelity, she spearheads initiatives to support founders and investors with equity management tools, fundraising strategy, and go-to-market best practices.

Laura Stoffel, partner at Gunderson Dettmer, adds legal expertise to the discussion. As a seasoned attorney specializing in the innovation economy, Laura guides entrepreneurs through the complexities of forming and structuring businesses, securing financing, and executing M&A transactions. Her deep understanding of governance and venture financing matters makes her an invaluable resource for startups at every stage of growth.

Melissa Withers, founder and managing partner of RevUp Capital, rounds out the panel with her unique perspective on early-stage investing. A trailblazer in the field, Melissa pioneered revenue-based funding with RevUp, offering startups an alternative to traditional equity models. With a commitment to supporting diverse founders and fostering innovation, Melissa’s approach to investing is reshaping the landscape of startup finance.

What are you waiting for? Book your passes now before prices go up at the door.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Fintech Fundid was shut down over interest rates and a strained cap table | TechCrunch


Winding down a startup can be bittersweet for founders. In the case of Fundid, rising interest rates killed the business finance startup. But VCs and partners hurt it, too, founder Stefanie Sample says.

TechCrunch profiled the company in 2022 when Sample raised $3.25 million in seed funding backed by fintech investor Nevcaut Ventures, The Artemis Fund and Builders and Backers.

Prior to Fundid, Sample spent more than a decade as the owner of more than a dozen profitable franchise businesses in Montana. She owns 12 Taco Bell locations and was the previous owner of two Massage Envy franchises, as well as three other companies that are all profitable. It was through that experience she saw firsthand how difficult it was for companies like hers to have access to capital.

She started Fundid to offer lending via a business-building credit card as well as finance resources like a grant-matching tool, marketed mainly to women business owners.

Because Fundid was a fintech company and not a bank, it decided to have a debt facility partner to underwrite its operations, Sample explained. She found a partner and pre-negotiated the secured overnight financing rates, or SOFR. This is an interest rate banks use to price U.S. dollar-denominated derivatives and loans.

However, between spring of 2022 and the end of 2023, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates 11 times. Just before Fundid launched its first card product, the debt facility partner went to Sample with some bad news.

“The numbers worked originally because the interest rate was nothing,” Sample told TechCrunch. “When the rates went up, that really screwed us because the debt facility was based on SOFR plus, so the numbers didn’t work.”

The cost of the capital would cost Fundid so much compared to the fees Fundid could charge, that Fundid would essentially be paying its customers to use its product, and “then numbers would never shake out,” Sample said.

Tough decisions

To keep going, Fundid “needed to put up a lot more collateral because of the changing environment,” Sample said.

An investor was going to help with this, but that would mean giving up more equity in the company, Sample said. She recalls even telling the investor that it would have been a bad investment.

“The cost of capital and the warrants would have resulted in him taking our entire company — just for us to exist,” she added. “The interest rate market became this opportunity for everyone around us to take our company, and then the business model didn’t work in our case anyways. It was like, ‘Well, what are we doing?’”

So, over the summer of 2023 Sample decided to wind down Fundid. The decision was made more difficult when Fundid was able to raise $2 million the summer of 2023 just as she was pulling the credit card from the market.

Raising capital while thinking of going dark is something Sample said doesn’t get talked about enough. Despite her thoughts, Fundid’s board still encouraged her to keep going and to take the additional capital. Investors told her that they believed in Sample and her ability to figure it out or build a new product or build a brand new company.

They wanted her to pivot. However, all of the money was invested toward building the credit card that Fundid couldn’t afford to keep in the current market. In addition, the cap table would have been “too messed up to try anything new,” Sample said.

However, Sample had other ideas.

“I was so burnt out at that time that I was having panic attacks,” she said. “I took a step back. It was a moment where I told myself, ‘this is what happens to women in venture.’ They already took more of my cap table and now they want me to build a brand new company on the existing cap table. And they’re kind of talking to me like I’m an idiot.”

So Sample rescinded the raise and gave the money back. That was in August 2023. Then came the part she dreaded: She had to lay off her team of five, doing so in November.

This was her first time firing employees, and Sample recalls sitting in a coffee shop and crying with them. Not because Fundid was dead, but because they “all loved working together so much. It was a heartbreaking day,” Sample said.

A fork in the venture road

She also said during this time she lost faith in the venture path. In 2023, the company was hitting all of its metrics in a timely manner. However, as the finance market changed, investors were actively collaborating with Sample to find a path forward. She described it like having “whiplash all the time.”

She also became disgruntled over how much of Fundid’s ownership she had lost, and could continue to lose if she stayed on the venture fund raising path. Sample spoke to other female founder friends who were raising at the seed stage and had already given up 30% of their company — similar to her.

As a general rule, seed investors typically want 10%-20%. Although 25% or even 30% is not unheard of, it is considered high for those early rounds.

But she felt that as a female founder, the odds were stacked against her, and she struggled to get competitive term sheets. The data backs up her perception. In 2022, female founders landed less than 19% of all venture fund dollars that year, PitchBook found. In 2023, it was 23%.

Far fewer female-founded companies are backed annually (less than 1,000 in 2023, compared to tens of thousands for males) and the deal amounts and valuations are lower, too, the PitchBook research shows.

“With the venture landscape, the goal posts are always moving or the rug being pulled out from under you,” Sample said. “When you are a female founder, you have to sacrifice a lot to be among the 2%. We end up paying ourselves less and accepting worse term sheets. The other part is that it is already so hard to get capital, yet the world is telling you to be grateful. I just wanted to build a real company, and it made me disgruntled how it all worked.”

A fresh start

The whole experience inspired Sample to write a postmortem post about Fundid’s journey, which she shared with TechCrunch. In it, Sample wrote that “Fundid may have failed as a company, but more than that, we acknowledge that we failed the small businesses that need innovation in capital markets.” In it she wrote, “Would I do it again? Honestly, no.”

In hindsight, she said she would definitely build the next company with a technical co-founder, not take money from friends and family and should have “stuck to her guns” when it came to not launching a credit card. “As the founder/CEO, I’m the decision maker; this is my fault,” Sample wrote.

Fundid’s official close date was April 1. After taking some time off — and learning how to play ukulele — Sample said the Fundid experience has, however, made her eager to go back to what she affectionately calls “real businesses.”

She’s now launched a new investment company called Pailor Capital that stems from her work helping women finance their own businesses. A better way to do that is to buy existing profitable companies, she feels. She’s also purchasing an existing business.

“My existing investors are fantastic, this is a reflection of seeking new investment in a market that decided fintech, lending and cards were no longer desirable,” she wrote in her postmortem.

Pailor Capital has made seven investments so far this year, all for women to find, buy and grow existing businesses.

“If we really want to make a dent on gender equality and business we’re better off encouraging women to go out and buy existing profitable businesses,” Sample said. “Then their impact as CEO essentially skips the ladder.”


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Carta, the cap table management outfit, is accused of unethical tactics by a customer after it tries brokering a deal for the startup's shares without consent | TechCrunch


Carta, an ambitious 12-year-old Silicon Valley outfit, has gone through numerous iterations over time, originally inviting investors, startups, and employees to use its software to manage their cap tables and later aspiring to evolve into a “private stock market for companies,” as founder Henry Ward once told TechCrunch. As he explained back in 2019: “Now that you have this network of companies and investors all on one platform and the ability to transfer securities, you can build liquidity on top of it.”

The strategy boosted Carta’s valuation in recent years. But a prominent customer is now accusing Carta of misusing sensitive information that startups entrust to the company in pursuit of its own ambitions. The claim is raising wider questions about how Carta operates, even as Carta argues the incident was isolated.

On Friday, Finnish CEO Karri Saarinen posted on LinkedIn that he had received surprising news about Linear – the project management software company he co-founded four years ago and that raised $35 million in funding this fall. Linear is a Carta customer, and according to Saarinen, earlier on Friday, without his consent or knowledge, a representative from Carta reached out to an angel investor in Linear, telling the individual that Carta had a “firm buy order” from either an individual or an institution — the Carta representative didn’t say —  at a specific price, though this buyer might be willing to “flex higher,” said the Carta employee in an email.

As it turns out, that angel investor is related to Saarinen and immediately alerted him to the email outreach. Clearly feeling betrayed by Carta, Saarinen wrote on LinkedIn, “This might be the end of Carta as the trusted platform for startups. As a founder it feels kind shitty that Carta, who I trust to manage our cap table, is now doing cold outreach to our angel investors about selling Linear shares to their non disclosed buyers.” Continued Saarinen, “They never contacted us (their customer) about starting an order book for Linear shares. The investor they reached out to is a family member whose investment we never published anywhere. We and they never opted in to any kind of secondary sales. Yet Carta Liquidity found their email and knew that they owned Linear shares.”

The post took on a life of its own – thousands have “liked” it and it has drawn nearly 800 comments – before Ward waded into the conversation to apologize. Ward also said the email to the Linear investor was not something that Carta condoned.  Wrote Ward: “Hii Karri and everyone, I’m appalled that this happened. We are still investigating but it appears that Friday morning an employee violated our internal procedures and went out of bounds reaching out to customers they shouldn’t have. This impacted Karri’s company and two other companies. We have contacted the other two companies and are continuing to investigate. If you have any other information please reach out to me directly at [email protected] to let me know while we continue our investigation.”

TechCrunch reached out to Ward for more information yesterday; he has not responded.

Saarinen meanwhile continued to post on LinkedIn that the incident seemed anything but isolated. “So far I’ve heard from 4 of our investors who were approached with the same email. All of them were the early pre-seed investors. Also heard from 2 companies who had this happen to them. One of them a prominent AI company.”

He further posted on X that, “I’ve learned from multiple companies that this has been going on for months or even years where investors or employees of private companies are solicited by Carta employees to put their shares on sale. These people haven’t opted in to this and companies haven’t approved these sales.”

Asked for comment, Saarinen told TechCrunch via email last night that, “I’m retiring from this fight, this already has consumed too much of my time . . . My trust in Carta hasn’t recovered after talking to the CEO.” Added Saarinen, “I hope Carta takes action on these issues but likely we will be moving on to another service as we no longer have confidence in them.”

TechCrunch also reached out to numerous Carta board members to ask about the practice.

One of them, venture capitalist Matt Murphy of Menlo Ventures, echoed what Ward told Saarinen on Linkedin, writing to TechCrunch via email that: “Carta does not use customer cap table data. The cap table business and the CartaX (private stock liquidity) business are separate business units with separate teams and leadership. There was a breach of this protocol from an employee on the CartaX team that has been dealt with and which we learned from.”

Meanwhile, startup founders are following the conversation and comparing notes.

As another founder told TechCrunch this morning, “I am a customer of Carta. I just learned about all of the weird stuff going on with them going behind companies’ backs to offer secondaries. I haven’t been affected by it, but I would be furious if I learned they were peddling shares in my company without my knowledge. I am definitely considering switching platforms.”

Companies ultimately have to approve transactions relating to secondary sales, notes Murphy. In a market where few companies are getting acquired or going public, equity shareholders are more amenable than perhaps management teams would like to selling their shares. Writes Murphy, “Almost every board meeting I go to, some employee is selling stock and we have to allow, exercise our ROFR and sometimes block if we can.”

Still, he suggests, Carta’s process is fairly straightforward — and ethical. “With Carta, they have a tender product where they coordinate directly with the company to help a process they would run. Then in the case of CartaX marketplace, we verify a buyer and confirm their demand, and they we use public sources of data like Crunchbase and Pitchbook to find potential supply to match the buyer.”

For Carta, the unflattering attention it is receiving owing to its dealings with Linear is the latest in a stream of bad publicity. Last October, Ward even emailed customers, telling them that if they are concerned about “negative press” tied to the outfit, they should read a Medium post of his. The move appeared only to call more attention to the many reported problems plaguing the company.

Carta kicked off 2023 by suing its former CTO. But it has been embroiled in numerous other lawsuits over the years.  In 2020, the company’s former VP of marketing sued Carta, accusing the outfit of gender discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination and of violating the California Equal Pay Act. (TechCrunch featured that case here.) Soon after, four employees spoke on the record with The New York Times, telling the outlet that when they voiced concerns about the way the company is run, they were sidelined, demoted or given pay cuts.

The company has also been accused of poor customer service. TechCrunch year interviewed numerous Carta customers who expressed dissatisfaction with the company and its representatives. One, a fund manager who is in the midst of transitioning off the platform currently, told TC that his team had “four different account managers in the less than a two-year engagement at Carta; it certainly didn’t help with continuity and understanding of our fund and needs.”




Software Development in Sri Lanka

Back
WhatsApp
Messenger
Viber