From Digital Age to Nano Age. WorldWide.

Tag: Meta039s

Robotic Automations

Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses now let you share images directly to your Instagram Story | TechCrunch


Meta is updating its Ray-Ban smart glasses with new hands-free functionality, the company announced on Wednesday. Most notably, users can now share an image from their smart glasses directly to their Instagram Story without needing to take out their phone. After you take a photo with the smart glasses, you can say, “Hey Meta, share […]

© 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Meta's Oversight Board takes its first Threads case | TechCrunch


Meta’s Oversight Board has now extended its scope to include the company’s newest platform, Instagram Threads. Designed as an independent appeals board that hears cases and then makes precedent-setting content moderation decisions, the board to date has decided on cases like Facebook’s ban of Donald Trump, Covid-19 misinformation, the removal of breast cancer photos, and […]

© 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Meta's latest experiment copies BeReal and Snapchat's core ideas | TechCrunch


Meta is once again taking on its competitors by developing a feature that borrows concepts from others — in this case, BeReal and Snapchat. The company is developing a feature for Instagram called “Peek” that would allow users to post authentic pictures that can only be viewed once. While Snapchat popularized the idea of ephemeral […]

© 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Meta's AI tools for advertisers can now create full new images, not just new backgrounds | TechCrunch


Meta is rolling out an expanded set of generative AI tools for advertisers, after first announcing a set of AI features last October. Now, instead of only being able to create different backgrounds for a product image, advertisers can also request full image variations, which offer AI-inspired ideas for the overall photo, including riffs that update the photo’s subject or product being advertised.

In one example, Meta shows how an existing ad creative showing a cup of coffee sitting outdoors next to coffee beans could be modified to present the cup, from a different angle, in front of lush greenery and coffee beans, evoking imagery reminiscent of a coffee farm.

This may not be a big deal if the image is only mean to encourage someone to visit a local coffee shop. But if it was the coffee cup itself that was for sale, then the AI variations Meta offers could be versions of the product that didn’t exist in real life.

The feature could be abused by advertisers who wanted to dupe consumers into buying products that don’t actually exist.

Meta admits this is a possible use case, saying that an advertiser could tailor the generated output with the coming Text Prompt feature with different colors of their product, from different angles and in different scenarios. Currently, the “different colors” option could be used to dupe customers into thinking a product looked different than it does in real life.

As Meta’s example demonstrates, the coffee cup itself could be transformed into different colors, or could be shown from different angles, where each cup has its own distinct swirl of foaming milk mixed in with the hot beverage.

However, Meta claims that it has strong guardrails in place to prevent its system from generating inappropriate ad content or low-quality images. This includes “pre-guardrails” to filter out images that its gen AI models don’t support and “post-guardrails” that filter out generated text and image content that doesn’t meet its quality bar or that it deems inappropriate. Plus, Meta said it stress-tested the feature using its Llama image and full ads image generation model with both internal and external experts to try to find unexpected ways it could be used, then addressed any vulnerabilities found.

Meta says this feature has already begun to roll out, and in the months ahead, advertisers will be able to provide text prompts to tailor the image’s variations, too.

Image Credits: Meta

Plus, Meta will now allow advertisers to add text overlays on their AI-generated images with a dozen of the most popular font typefaces available to choose from.

Another feature, image expansion, also introduced in October 2023, will now be available to Reels in addition to the Feed, across both Facebook and Instagram. This option leverages AI to help advertisers adjust their image assets to fit across different aspect ratios, like Reels and Feed. The idea is that advertisers could spend less time repurposing their creative assets for different surfaces. Meta says text overlay will work along with image expansion, too.

One advertiser, smartphone case maker Casetify, said that using Meta’s GenAI Background Generation feature led to a 13% increase in return on its ad spend. The company had tested the option with its Advantage+ shopping campaigns, where the AI features first became available in the fall. The updated AI features will also be available through Ads Manager via Advantage+ creative, as before.

Image Credits: Meta

Beyond images, Meta’s AI can be used to generate alternate versions of the ad headline, in addition to the ad’s primary text, which was already supported by leveraging the original copy. Meta says it’s testing the ability for this text to also sound like the brand’s voice and tone, using previous campaigns as its reference material. Text generation capabilities will be moved to Mets’s next-gen LLM (large language model), Meta Llama 3.

All the generative AI features will become available globally to advertisers by the end of the year.

Outside of the AI updates, Meta also announced it would expand its subscription service, Meta Verified for businesses, to new markets including Argentina, Mexico, Chile, Peru, France, and Italy. The service began testing last year in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. 

Now, Meta Verified will offer four different tiers to its subscription plan, all with the base features of a verified badge, account support, and impersonation monitoring. Higher tiers will include new tools like profile enhancements, tools for creating connections, and more ways to access customer support.

Meta Verified will be expanded to WhatsApp soon, the company also said.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Meta's approach to election security in the frame as EU probes Fb, Instagram | TechCrunch


The European Union announced Tuesday it suspects Meta’s social networking platforms, Facebook and Instagram, of breaking the bloc’ rules for larger platforms in relation to election integrity.

The Commission has opened the formal infringement proceedings to investigate Meta under the the Digital Services Act (DSA), an online governance and content moderation framework. Reminder: Penalties for confirmed breaches of the regime can include fines of up to 6% of global annual turnover.

The EU’s concerns here span several areas: Meta’s moderation of political ads — which it suspects is inadequate; Meta’s policies for moderating non-paid political content, which the EU suspects are opaque and overly restrictive, whereas the DSA demands platforms’ policies deliver transparency and accountability; and Meta’s policies that relate to enabling outsiders to monitor elections.

The EU’s proceeding also targets Meta’s processes for users to flag illegal content, which it’s concerned aren’t user friendly enough; and its internal complaints handling system for content moderation decisions, which it also suspects are ineffective.

“When Meta get paid for displaying advertising it doesn’t appear that they have put in place effective mechanism of content moderation,” said a Commission official briefing journalists on background on the factors that led it to open the bundle of investigations. “Including for advertisements that could be generated by a generative AI — such as, for example, deep fakes — and these have been exploited or appear to have be exploited by malicious actors for foreign interference.”

The EU is drawing on some independent research, itself enabled by another DSA requirement that large platforms publish a searchable ad archive, which it suggested has shown Meta’s ad platform being exploited by Russian influence campaigns targeting elections via paid ads. It also said it’s found evidence of a lack of effective ads moderation by Meta being generally exploited scammers — with the Commission pointing to a surge in financial scam ads on the platform.

On organic (non-paid) political content, the EU said Meta seems to limit the visibility of political content for users by default but does does not appear to provide sufficient explanation — either of how it identifies content as political nor how moderation is done. The Commission also said it had found evidence to suggest Meta is shadowbanning (aka limiting the visibility/reach) certain accounts with high volumes of political posting.

If confirmed, such actions would be a breach of the DSA as the regulation puts a legal obligation on platforms to transparently communicate the policies they apply to their users.

On election monitoring, the EU is particularly concerned about Meta’s recent decision to shutter access to CrowdTangle, a tool researchers have previously been able to use for real-time election monitoring.

It’s not opened an investigation on this yet but has sent Meta an urgent formal request for information (RFI) about its decision to deprecate the research tool — giving the company five days to respond. Briefing journalists about the development, Commission officials suggested they could take more action in this area, such as opening a formal investigation, depending on Meta’s response.

The short deadline for a response clearly conveys a sense of urgency. Last year, soon after the EU took up the baton overseeing larger platforms’ DSA compliance with a subset of transparency and risk mitigation rules, the Commission named election integrity as one of its priority areas for its enforcement of the regulation.

During today’s briefing, Commission officials pointed to the upcoming European elections in June — questioning the timing of Meta’s decision to deprecate CrowdTangle. “Our concern — and this is also why we consider this to be a particular urgent issue — is that just a few weeks ahead of the European election Meta has decided to deprecate this tool, which has allowed journalists… civil society actors and researchers in, for example, the 2020 US elections, to monitor election related risks.”

The Commission is worried another tool Meta has said will replace CrowdTangle does not have equivalent/superior capabilities. Notably the EU is concerned it will not let outsiders monitor election risks in real-time. Officials also raised concerns about slow onboarding for Meta’s new tool.

“At this point we’re requesting information from Meta on how they intend to remedy this the lack of real time election monitoring tool,” said one senior Commission official during the briefing. “We are also requesting some additional documents from them on the decision that has led them to deprecate Crowdtangle and their assessment on the capabilities of the new tool.”

Meta was contacted for comment about the Commission’s actions. In a statement a company spokesperson said: “We have a well-established process for identifying and mitigating risks on our platforms. We look forward to continuing our cooperation with the European Commission and providing them with further details of this work.”

These are the first formal DSA investigations Meta has faced — but not the first RFIs. Last year the EU sent Meta a flurry of requests for information — including in relation to the Israel-Hamas war, election security and child safety, among others.

In light of the variety of information requests on Meta platforms, the company could face additional DSA investigations as Commission enforcers work through multiple submissions.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

EU privacy body adopts view on Meta's controversial 'consent or pay' tactic | TechCrunch


Incoming guidance by an expert steering body on European Union data protection law could have major implications for Meta’s advertising business model. The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has decided that large platforms such as Facebook and Instagram cannot force a “binary” pay or consent choice on users, Politico reported on Wednesday, citing two people with direct knowledge of the decision.

Yet, a binary choice (AKA “consent or pay”) is exactly what Meta wants to enforce on users in the region. The decision looks set to leave Meta with no option but to reform its business model to comply with EU law, which would mean giving users in the bloc the ability to deny its tracking.

The EDPB has been meeting this week to discuss adopting an opinion on the so-called “consent or pay” model following a request made back in February by a trio of concerned data protection authorities. A spokeswoman for the EDPB confirmed to TechCrunch that it adopted an opinion on “consent or pay” on Wednesday morning, saying it will be published later today. However, she would not confirm the substance of the decision, saying, “We are not in a position to comment on the content of the opinion before the opinion is published.”

After EU regulators and courts overturned two prior legal bases Meta had claimed for processing people’s data for ads, the company went on to launch a controversial subscription offer in the EU last fall. The company claimed its offer constituted valid consent under the bloc’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which regulates how personal data can be handled (including the need to have a valid legal basis for such processing).

However, the choice Meta gives EU users is a binary one: Either consent to its use of personal data for targeted advertising, or pay a monthly fee to access ad-free versions of its social networks. Meta initially set the monthly fee at €13 per mobile account, and later proposed to halve the cost. But privacy campaigners and consumer rights groups have continued to cry foul and file a raft of complaints, arguing the flaws of “consent or pay” run far deeper than Meta’s chosen price-point.

Lawmakers and the European Commission have also waded into the fray. The latter is investigating whether Meta’s use of the mechanism complies with the bloc’s Digital Markets Act, which requires in-scope platforms to obtain consent to process user data for ads. It has also questioned Meta about its claim of consent under the Digital Services Act.

But the EDPB’s opinion is critical for the core issue of whether Meta’s mechanism complies with the EU’s long-standing data protection framework. So the full detail of the opinion will be pored over when it’s made public.

In its report, Politico cites part of the EDPB decision: “In most cases, it will not be possible for large online platforms to comply with the requirements for valid consent if they confront users only with a binary choice between consenting to processing of personal data for behavioural advertising purposes and paying a fee.”

Privacy rights nonprofit noyb, which has been fighting the rise of “consent or pay” tactics on regional websites for years, seized on the development to trumpet a win against Meta. The organization also cautioned that it will need to analyze the full EDPB opinion in detail once it’s available.

“Overall, Meta is out of options in the EU. It must now give users a genuine yes/no option for personalised advertising,” said noyb’s founder and chairman, Max Schrems, in a statement following Politico’s report.

“[Meta] can still charge sites for reach, engage in contextual advertising and the like — but tracking people for ads needs a clear ‘yes’ from users,” Schrems added. He suggested a third option (i.e. not tracking, or not paying) could also, for example, entail Meta collecting revenue from sponsored posts or other types of paid content, just so long as there’s no tracking or targeting of users involved.

Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the development.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Watch: TikTok and Meta's latest moves signal a more commodified internet | TechCrunch


The internet’s mega-platforms are slowly merging into a great blob of sameness, and even the hottest companies in the world are not immune from the trend. TikTok’s winning strategy to focus on short-form, vertical video has found fans amongst other internet platforms, and now TikTok is taking a page from its rival, books, reportedly borrowing from what made them popular.

TikTok is working toward launching a new app called TikTok Notes that will allow users to post images in an apparent bid to rival Instagram, a service best known for its static-photo-sharing feature. Instagram, of course, has expanded into video and stories itself, taking pieces of other services and incorporating them into its own product.

Instagram’s parent company Meta’s other services are frequent borrowers as well. As is nearly every social service you can imagine. Recall that great Stories Boom that led to everyone from Line to Spotify to Instagram to LinkedIn trying out the popular sharing format. If it works for one social media service, expect the rest to follow in some manner at some point — probably sooner rather than later.

There’s good logic behind the effort. The answer is why X wants to become a super app; the more a service can offer its userbase to do, the more time they may spend inside the app’s walls. Expanding a feature set can bolster engaged time, and therefore how much revenue a social media service can earn. At the same time, bloat is a real issue that can dilute a user experience and render an app, well, Facebook in time.

This theme — the slow commodification of digital services via sameification — is similar to why we’re seeing LinkedIn try to ape The New York Times’ gaming might, and to some degree why major platform companies in tech wind up trying to be good at everything: the never-ending need to grow revenue. Perhaps this is why your favorite app always feels more and more like an alien world as time passes. It will evolve away from what made it special, and unique, because sticking to those guns is not the way to create a service that the maximum number of people will use. For that, you need to become Facebook.


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Watch: Meta's new Llama 3 models give open-source AI a boost


New AI models from Meta are making waves in technology circles. The two new models, part of the Facebook parent company’s Llama line of artificial intelligence tools, are both open-source, helping them stand apart from competing offerings from OpenAI and other well-known names.

Meta’s new Llama models have differently sized underlying datasets, with the Llama 3 8B model featuring eight billion parameters, and the Llama 3 70B model some seventy billion parameters. The more parameters, the more powerful the model, but not every AI task needs the largest possible dataset.

The company’s new models, which were trained on 24,000 GPU clusters, perform well across benchmarks that Meta put them up against, besting some rivals’ models that were already in the market. What matters for those of us not competing to build and release the most capable, or largest AI models, what we care about is that they are still getting better with time. And work. And a lot of compute.

While Meta takes an open-source approach to AI work, its competitors are often prefer more closed-source work. OpenAI, despite its name and history, offers access to its models, but not their source code. There’s a healthy debate in the world of AI regarding which approach is better, for both speed of development and also safety. After all, some technologists — and some computing doomers, to be clear — are worried that AI tech is developing too fast and could prove dangerous to democracies and more.

For now, Meta is keeping the AI fires alight, offering a new challenge to its peers and rivals to best their latest. Hit play, and let’s talk about it!


Software Development in Sri Lanka

Robotic Automations

Hundreds of creators sign letter slamming Meta's limit on political content | TechCrunch


If you haven’t been seeing much political content on Instagram lately, there’s a reason for that. Since March, Instagram and Threads have instituted a new default setting that limits political content you see from people you’re not following.

Hundreds of creators, convened by GLAAD and Accountable Tech, have signed an open letter demanding that Instagram make the political content limit an opt-in feature, rather than on by default.

“With many of us providing authoritative and factual content on Instagram that helps people understand current events, civic engagement, and electoral participation, Instagram is thereby limiting our ability to reach people online to help foster more inclusive and participatory democracy and society during a critical inflection point for our country,” the letter reads.

The letter’s signatories include comedian Alok Vaid-Menon (1.3 million followers), Glee actor Kevin McHale (1.1 million), news account So Informed (3.1 million), activist Carlos Eduardo Espina (664,000), Under the Desk News (397,000) and other meme accounts, political organizers and entertainers.

Instagram’s definition of political content leaves a lot of room for interpretation, which stokes further concern among these creators. It describes political content as anything “potentially related to things like laws, elections, or social topics.”

The letter points out that this “endangers the reach of marginalized folks speaking to their own lived experience on Meta’s platforms” and limits the conversation around topics like climate change, gun control and reproductive rights.

For political creators, these limits can also impact their livelihood, since it will be harder to reach new audiences. While Instagram isn’t particularly lucrative (there’s no regular revenue share with creators), building a following on the platform can lead to other financial opportunities, like brand sponsorships.

As election season looms in the U.S., Instagram’s decision to distance itself from politics could seem like a way to do damage control — Meta has a less-than-stellar track record when it comes to its role in elections. But Meta could be creating even more problems by siloing its users into political echo chambers, where they’re never exposed to any information from people outside their existing circles.

“Removing political recommendations as a default setting, and consequently stopping people from seeing suggested political content poses a serious threat to political engagement, education, and activism,” the letter says.

 




Software Development in Sri Lanka

Back
WhatsApp
Messenger
Viber